Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wanyi Wu

dblp:397/8084 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › non-IID data handling
client drift mitigation
0.912025
Federated Learning with Sample-level Client Drift Mitigation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity
0.912025
Federated Learning with Sample-level Client Drift Mitigation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.912025
Federated Learning with Sample-level Client Drift Mitigation · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

warm-up training · 0.9bias-aware sample selection · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Federated Learning with Sample-level Client Drift Mitigation
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) suffers from severe performance degradation due to the data heterogeneity among clients. Existing works reveal that the fundamental reason is that data heterogeneity can cause client drift where the local model update deviates from the global one, and thus they usually tackle this problem from the perspective of calibrating the obtained local update. Despite effectiveness, existing methods substantially lack a deep understanding of how heterogeneous data samples contribute to the formation of client drift. In this paper, we bridge this gap by identifying that the drift can be viewed as a cumulative manifestation of biases present in all local samples and the bias between samples is different. Besides, the bias dynamically changes as the FL training progresses. Motivated by this, we propose FedBSS that first mitigates the heterogeneity issue in a sample-level manner, orthogonal to existing methods. Specifically, the core idea of our method is to adopt a bias-aware sample selection scheme that dynamically selects the samples from small biases to large epoch by epoch to train progressively the local model in each round. In order to ensure the stability of training, we set the diversified knowledge acquisition stage as the warm-up stage to avoid the local optimality caused by knowledge deviation in the early stage of the model. Evaluation results show that FedBSS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. In addition, we also achieved effective results on feature distribution skew and noise label dataset setting, which proves that FedBSS can not only reduce heterogeneity, but also has scalability and robustness.
Wanyi Wu
AAAI3