Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuanfu Sun

dblp:398/3248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 59% Graph learning · 34% Reinforcement learning · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.912025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
graph neural network robustness
0.912025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial natural language processing
prompt-based attack
0.912025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph foundation model
graph language model
0.312025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.312025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tool use · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0curriculum learning · 1.0large language model · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9adversarial training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AgentGL: Towards Agentic Graph Learning with LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on agentic capabilities-iterative retrieval, tool use, and decision-making-to overcome the limits of static, parametric knowledge.Yet existing agentic frameworks treat external information as unstructured text and fail to leverage the topological dependencies inherent in real-world data.To bridge this gap, we introduce Agentic Graph Learning (AGL), a paradigm that reframes graph learning as an interleaved process of topology-aware navigation and LLM-based inference.Specifically, we propose AgentGL, the first reinforcement learning (RL)-driven framework for AGL.AgentGL equips an LLM agent with graphnative tools for multi-scale exploration, regulates tool usage via search-constrained thinking to balance accuracy and efficiency, and employs a graph-conditioned curriculum RL strategy to stabilize long-horizon policy learning without step-wise supervision.Across diverse Text-Attributed Graph (TAG) benchmarks and multiple LLM backbones, AgentGL substantially outperforms strong GraphLLMs and GraphRAG baselines, achieving absolute improvements of up to 17.5% in node classification and 28.4% in link prediction.These results demonstrate that AGL is a promising frontier for enabling LLMs to autonomously navigate and reason over complex relational environments.The code is publicly available at https://github.com/sunyuanfu/AgentGL.
Yuanfu Sun, Dongzhe Fan, Jiajin Liu, Qiaoyu Tan
ACL (1)1
2025 TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks
abstract
Inspired by the success of large language models (LLMs), there is a significant research shift from traditional graph learning methods to LLM-based graph frameworks, formally known as GraphLLMs. GraphLLMs leverage the reasoning power of LLMs by integrating three key components: the textual attributes of input nodes, the structural information of node neighborhoods, and task-specific prompts that guide decision-making. Despite their promise, the robustness of GraphLLMs against adversarial perturbations remains largely unexplored-a critical concern for deploying these models in high-stakes scenarios. To bridge the gap, we introduce TrustGLM, a comprehensive study evaluating the vulnerability of GraphLLMs to adversarial attacks across three dimensions: text, graph structure, and prompt manipulations. We implement state-of-the-art attack algorithms from each perspective to rigorously assess model resilience. Through extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets from diverse domains, our findings reveal that GraphLLMs are highly susceptible to text attacks that merely replace a few semantically similar words in a node's textual attribute. We also find that standard graph structure attack methods can significantly degrade model performance, while random shuffling of the candidate label set in prompt templates leads to substantial performance drops. Beyond characterizing these vulnerabilities, we investigate defense techniques tailored to each attack vector through data-augmented training and adversarial training, which show promising potential to enhance the robustness of GraphLLMs. We hope that our open-sourced library will facilitate rapid, equitable evaluation and inspire further innovative research in this field. The benchmark code can be found in https://github.com/Palasonic5/TrustGLM.git.
Qihai Zhang, Xinyue Sheng, Yuanfu Sun, Qiaoyu Tan
KDD (2)3