Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeffrey A. Stoll

dblp:40/3812 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 69% Robot manipulation · 31%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control
visual servoing
0.112007
Real-Time Visual Servoing of a Robot Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound · ICRA 2007
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › ultrasound imaging
3d ultrasound
0.112006
Real-time 3D Ultrasound-based Servoing of a Surgical Instrument · ICRA 2006
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging
0.112006
Real-time 3D Ultrasound-based Servoing of a Surgical Instrument · ICRA 2006
Medical and health informatics
medical robotics
0.112006
Real-time 3D Ultrasound-based Servoing of a Surgical Instrument · ICRA 2006
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
surgical robotics
0.012003
Port placement planning in robot-assisted coronary artery bypass · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2003
Medical and health informatics
surgical robotics
0.012007
Real-Time Visual Servoing of a Robot Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012006
Real-time 3D Ultrasound-based Servoing of a Surgical Instrument · ICRA 2006
Medical and health informatics › computer-assisted surgery
surgical planning
0.012003
Port placement planning in robot-assisted coronary artery bypass · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image-based tracking · 0.1GPU-accelerated tracking · 0.1passive instrument marker · 0.1line detection · 0.1image processing · 0.1preoperative image analysis · 0.1performance measure optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Passive Markers for Tracking Surgical Instruments in Real-Time 3-D Ultrasound Imaging
abstract
A family of passive echogenic markers is presented by which the position and orientation of a surgical instrument can be determined in a 3-D ultrasound volume, using simple image processing. Markers are attached near the distal end of the instrument so that they appear in the ultrasound volume along with the instrument tip. They are detected and measured within the ultrasound image, thus requiring no external tracking device. This approach facilitates imaging instruments and tissue simultaneously in ultrasound-guided interventions. Marker-based estimates of instrument pose can be used in augmented reality displays or for image-based servoing. Design principles for marker shapes are presented that ensure imaging system and measurement uniqueness constraints are met. An error analysis is included that can be used to guide marker design and which also establishes a lower bound on measurement uncertainty. Finally, examples of marker measurement and tracking algorithms are presented along with experimental validation of the concepts.
Jeffrey A. Stoll, Hongliang Ren 0001, Pierre E. Dupont
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging1
2007 Real-Time Visual Servoing of a Robot Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound
abstract
This paper presents a robotic system capable of using three-dimensional ultrasound to guide a surgical instrument to a tracked target location. Tracking of both the surgical instrument and target was done using image based algorithms on the real-time 3D ultrasound data. The tracking techniques are shown to be especially amenable for execution on powerful graphics processor units. By harnessing a graphics card, it was possible to detect both a surgical instrument and a surgical target at a rate of 25 Hz. The high update rate permits the use of tracked instrument and target locations for controlling a robot. Validation of the system was done in a water tank, where the robot moved the instrument to the target site with a mean error of 1.2 mm
Paul M. Novotny, Jeffrey A. Stoll, Pierre E. Dupont, Robert D. Howe
ICRA2
2007 GPU based real-time instrument tracking with three-dimensional ultrasound
Paul M. Novotny, Jeffrey A. Stoll, Nikolay V. Vasilyev, Pedro J. del Nido, Pierre E. Dupont, Todd E. Zickler, Robert D. Howe
Medical Image Anal.2
2006 Real-time 3D Ultrasound-based Servoing of a Surgical Instrument
abstract
This paper presents a real-time 3D ultrasoundguided robotic system, designed to autonomously navigate a surgical instrument to surgeon-specified target points. The system tracks the instrument in real-time (2 Hz) using image processing. Thus, it does not require tracking of the ultrasound scan head. It makes use of a line detection algorithm and a passive instrument marker, which together report the instrument's position and orientation (6 d.o.f.) from a single ultrasound image. Validation experiments are presented. The system controlled instrument position in a variety of image locations with a mean error of 0.8 mm
Jeffrey A. Stoll, Paul M. Novotny, Robert D. Howe, Pierre E. Dupont
ICRA1
2006 GPU Based Real-Time Instrument Tracking with Three Dimensional Ultrasound
Paul M. Novotny, Jeffrey A. Stoll, Nikolay V. Vasilyev, Pedro J. del Nido, Pierre E. Dupont, Robert D. Howe
MICCAI (1)2
2005 Passive Markers for Ultrasound Tracking of Surgical Instruments
Jeffrey A. Stoll, Pierre E. Dupont
MICCAI (2)1
2003 A Navigation System for Augmenting Laparoscopic Ultrasound
James Ellsmere, Jeffrey A. Stoll, David W. Rattner, David Brooks 0002, Robert Kane, William M. Wells III, Ron Kikinis, Kirby G. Vosburgh
MICCAI (2)2
2003 Port placement planning in robot-assisted coronary artery bypass
abstract
Properly selected port sites for robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) improve the efficiency and quality of these procedures. In clinical practice, surgeons select port locations using external anatomic landmarks to estimate a patient's internal anatomy. This paper proposes an automated approach to port selection based on a preoperative image of the patient, thus avoiding the need to estimate internal anatomy. Using this image as input, port sites are chosen from a grid of surgeon-approved options by defining a performance measure for each possible port triad. This measure seeks to minimize the weighted squared deviation of the instrument and endoscope angles from their optimal orientations at each internal surgical site. This performance measure proves insensitive to perturbations in both its weighting factors and moderate intraoperative displacements of the patient's internal anatomy. A validation study of this port site selection was performed. cardiac algorithm also Six surgeons dissected model vessels using the port triad selected by this algorithm with performance compared to dissection using a surgeon-selected port triad and a port triad template described by Tabaie et al., 1999. With the algorithm-selected ports, dissection speed increased by up to 43% (p = 0.046) with less overall vessel trauma. Thus, this algorithmic approach to port site selection has important clinical implications for robot-assisted CABG which warrant further investigation.
Jeremy W. Cannon, Jeffrey A. Stoll, Shaun Selha, Pierre E. Dupont, Robert D. Howe, David F. Torchiana
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2