Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

M. E. Share

dblp:40/5790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
access control models		 0.011986
Some Owner Based Schemes with Dynamic Groups in the Schematic Protection Model · S&P 1986
Authentication and access control
access control policy		 0.011986
Some Owner Based Schemes with Dynamic Groups in the Schematic Protection Model · S&P 1986
Authentication and access control › access control models
schematic protection model		 0.011986
Some Owner Based Schemes with Dynamic Groups in the Schematic Protection Model · S&P 1986
Authentication and access control › access control › multi-user access control
group access control		 0.011986
Some Owner Based Schemes with Dynamic Groups in the Schematic Protection Model · S&P 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy specification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Some Owner Based Schemes with Dynamic Groups in the Schematic Protection Model
abstract
The discretionary ability implied in the notion of ownership is often provided in terms of groups rather than individuals. The group approach has its conveniences but is limiting since access decisions do not discriminate among members of a group. The ability for users to define group membership dynamically offers flexibility and convenience. In this paper we investigate a variety of polices for doing so in the context of a simplified file system. We specify the polices using the Schematic Protection Model (SPM). Our investigation reveals that there are many policy options and demonstrates how SPM is used to precisely specify these options.
Ravi S. Sandhu, M. E. Share
 S&P2