Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junfeng Liu 0001

dblp:40/6926-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4570-5043ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Indexing and storage engines · 50% Graph data management · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
key-value storage
1.322026
ArceKV: Towards Workload-driven LSM-compactions for Key-Value Store Under Dynamic Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Storage systems › key-value storage
LSM-tree compaction
1.012026
ArceKV: Towards Workload-driven LSM-compactions for Key-Value Store Under Dynamic Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Graph data management
graph database
0.912025
Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Graph data management
graph storage
0.912025
Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Indexing and storage engines
key-value store
0.812024
Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Indexing and storage engines
LSM-tree
0.812024
Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Indexing and storage engines › membership query › approximate membership query
bloom filter
0.212024
Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

key-value encoding · 1.7adaptive edge insertion and deletion · 1.7workload-driven compaction · 1.0cost analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Evaluating Learned Indexes in LSM-tree Systems: Benchmarks, Insights and Design Choices
Junfeng Liu 0001, Jiarui Ye, Mengshi Chen, Meng Li 0010, Siqiang Luo
EDBT1
2026 AdCache: Adaptive Cache Management with Admission Control for LSM-tree Key-Value Stores
Jiarui Ye, Junfeng Liu 0001, Siqiang Luo
EDBT2
2026 ArceKV: Towards Workload-driven LSM-compactions for Key-Value Store Under Dynamic Workloads
Junfeng Liu 0001, Haoxuan Xie, Siqiang Luo
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2025 Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database
abstract
There is a proliferation of applications requiring the management of large-scale, evolving graphs under workloads with intensive graph updates and lookups. Driven by this challenge, we introduce Poly-LSM , a high-performance key-value storage engine for graphs with the following novel techniques: (1) Poly-LSM is embedded with a new design of graph-oriented LSM-tree structure that features a hybrid storage model for concisely and effectively storing graph data. (2) Poly-LSM utilizes an adaptive mechanism to handle edge insertions and deletions on graphs with optimized I/O efficiency. (3) Poly-LSM exploits the skewness of graph data to encode the key-value entries. Building upon this foundation, we further implement Aster , a robust and versatile graph database that supports Gremlin query language facilitating various graph applications. In our experiments, we compared Aster against several mainstream real-world graph databases. The results demonstrate that Aster outperforms all baseline graph databases, especially on large-scale graphs. Notably, on the billion-scale Twitter graph dataset, Aster achieves up to 17x throughput improvement compared to the best-performing baseline graph system.
Dingheng Mo, Junfeng Liu 0001, Fan Wang 0022, Siqiang Luo
Proc. ACM Manag. Data2
2024 Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space
abstract
Mainstream LSM-tree-based key-value stores face challenges in optimizing performance for point lookup, range lookup, and update operations concurrently due to their constrained configurations. They typically follow fixed patterns to specify the level capacity and the number of sorted runs per-level. This confines their designs to a restricted space, limiting opportunities for broader optimizations. To address this challenge, we consider a more flexible configuration that enables independent adjustments of the number of runs per-level, size ratio, and Bloom filter settings at each LSM-tree level. By carefully analyzing the cost of each operation based on the new design space, we unveil two critical insights for optimizing the tradeoff among the three operations. Firstly, achieving efficient point lookup requires a large last level. Secondly, there is a specific correlation between the number of runs per level and size ratio that is advantageous for overall update and range lookup performance. Based on these insights, we introduce Moose, a structure delivering an impressive overall performance for point lookup, range lookup, and update concurrently. Furthermore, we also introduce a new framework, Smoose, to navigate the design space for adapting specific workloads. We implemented Moose and Smoose on top of RocksDB and experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art LSM-tree structures across diverse workloads.
Junfeng Liu 0001, Fan Wang 0022, Dingheng Mo, Siqiang Luo
Proc. ACM Manag. Data1