Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junfeng Liu 0001
dblp:40/6926-1
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4570-5043ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Indexing and storage engines · 50% Graph data management · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
key-value storage |
1.3 | 2 | 2026 | ArceKV: Towards Workload-driven LSM-compactions for Key-Value Store Under Dynamic Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026 Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Storage systems › key-value storage
LSM-tree compaction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ArceKV: Towards Workload-driven LSM-compactions for Key-Value Store Under Dynamic Workloads · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026 |
Graph data management
graph database |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Graph data management
graph storage |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph Database · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Indexing and storage engines
key-value store |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Indexing and storage engines
LSM-tree |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Indexing and storage engines › membership query › approximate membership query
bloom filter |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration Space · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
key-value encoding · 1.7adaptive edge insertion and deletion · 1.7workload-driven compaction · 1.0cost analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Evaluating Learned Indexes in LSM-tree Systems: Benchmarks, Insights and Design Choices
Junfeng Liu 0001, Jiarui Ye, Mengshi Chen, Meng Li 0010, Siqiang Luo |
EDBT | 1 |
| 2026 | AdCache: Adaptive Cache Management with Admission Control for LSM-tree Key-Value Stores
Jiarui Ye, Junfeng Liu 0001, Siqiang Luo |
EDBT | 2 |
| 2026 | ArceKV: Towards Workload-driven LSM-compactions for Key-Value Store Under Dynamic Workloads
Junfeng Liu 0001, Haoxuan Xie, Siqiang Luo |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2025 | Aster: Enhancing LSM-structures for Scalable Graph DatabaseabstractThere is a proliferation of applications requiring the management of large-scale, evolving graphs under workloads with intensive graph updates and lookups. Driven by this challenge, we introduce Poly-LSM , a high-performance key-value storage engine for graphs with the following novel techniques: (1) Poly-LSM is embedded with a new design of graph-oriented LSM-tree structure that features a hybrid storage model for concisely and effectively storing graph data. (2) Poly-LSM utilizes an adaptive mechanism to handle edge insertions and deletions on graphs with optimized I/O efficiency. (3) Poly-LSM exploits the skewness of graph data to encode the key-value entries. Building upon this foundation, we further implement Aster , a robust and versatile graph database that supports Gremlin query language facilitating various graph applications. In our experiments, we compared Aster against several mainstream real-world graph databases. The results demonstrate that Aster outperforms all baseline graph databases, especially on large-scale graphs. Notably, on the billion-scale Twitter graph dataset, Aster achieves up to 17x throughput improvement compared to the best-performing baseline graph system. Dingheng Mo, Junfeng Liu 0001, Fan Wang 0022, Siqiang Luo |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 2 |
| 2024 | Structural Designs Meet Optimality: Exploring Optimized LSM-tree Structures in a Colossal Configuration SpaceabstractMainstream LSM-tree-based key-value stores face challenges in optimizing performance for point lookup, range lookup, and update operations concurrently due to their constrained configurations. They typically follow fixed patterns to specify the level capacity and the number of sorted runs per-level. This confines their designs to a restricted space, limiting opportunities for broader optimizations. To address this challenge, we consider a more flexible configuration that enables independent adjustments of the number of runs per-level, size ratio, and Bloom filter settings at each LSM-tree level. By carefully analyzing the cost of each operation based on the new design space, we unveil two critical insights for optimizing the tradeoff among the three operations. Firstly, achieving efficient point lookup requires a large last level. Secondly, there is a specific correlation between the number of runs per level and size ratio that is advantageous for overall update and range lookup performance. Based on these insights, we introduce Moose, a structure delivering an impressive overall performance for point lookup, range lookup, and update concurrently. Furthermore, we also introduce a new framework, Smoose, to navigate the design space for adapting specific workloads. We implemented Moose and Smoose on top of RocksDB and experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art LSM-tree structures across diverse workloads. Junfeng Liu 0001, Fan Wang 0022, Dingheng Mo, Siqiang Luo |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 1 |