Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Thayer

dblp:40/9540 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-0318-1399ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
4 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 41% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 26% Immersive interaction · 20%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Haptics and multimodal interaction › visuo-haptic illusion
haptic retargeting
0.312018
VR Grabbers: Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting for Precision Grabbing Tools · UIST 2018
Immersive interaction
virtual reality interaction
0.312018
VR Grabbers: Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting for Precision Grabbing Tools · UIST 2018
Collaborative and social computing › groupware
calendar sharing
0.322013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
I love you, let's share calendars: calendar sharing as relationship work · CSCW 2012
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.212013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal relationships
intimate relationships
0.212013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic feedback
passive haptic feedback
0.112018
VR Grabbers: Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting for Precision Grabbing Tools · UIST 2018
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
personal information management
0.012013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing
interpersonal communication
0.012012
I love you, let's share calendars: calendar sharing as relationship work · CSCW 2012
Learning and educational technologies
reading technology
0.012011
The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.3perceptual threshold measurement · 0.3qualitative analysis · 0.2interview study · 0.2semi-structured interviews · 0.1qualitative user study · 0.1qualitative study · 0.1long-term deployment study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 VR Grabbers: Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting for Precision Grabbing Tools
abstract
Haptic feedback in VR is important for realistic simulation in virtual reality. However, recreating the haptic experience for hand tools in VR traditionally requires hardware with precise actuators, adding complexity to the system. We propose Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting, an interaction technique that provides a realistic haptic experience for grabbing tools using only passive mechanisms. This technique leverages the ungrounded feedback inherent in grabbing tools combined with dynamic visual adjustments of their position in virtual reality to create an illusion of physical presence for virtual objects. To demonstrate the capabilities of this technique, we created VR Grabbers, an exemplary passive VR controller, similar to training chopsticks, with haptic feedback for precise object selection and manipulation. We conducted two user studies based on VR Grabbers. The first study probed the perceptual limits of the illusion; we found that the maximum position difference between the virtual and physical world acceptable to the user is (-1.48, 1.95) cm. The second study showed that task performance of the VR Grabbers controller with Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting enabled outperforms the same controller with Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting disabled.
Jackie Yang, Hiroshi Horii, Alexander Thayer, Rafael Ballagas
UIST3
2014 Theme issue on EIST
Alexander Thayer
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.1
2013 Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars
abstract
This study enriches the understanding of relationship work in the context of calendar sharing by examining how people negotiate and enact accountability in their intimate relationships with and around their shared calendars. We conducted 13 semi-structured interviews as part of a qualitative study of Google Calendar users. Our research discovered how participants develop understandings of how close friends and significant others structure their time using shared calendars, as well as how people negotiate and enact accounts within and beyond their intimate relationships. Our findings indicate ways in which Online Calendar Systems (OCS) can be better designed to more effectively support users' needs.
Alexander Thayer, Behzod Sirjani, Charlotte P. Lee
CSCW1
2012 I love you, let's share calendars: calendar sharing as relationship work
abstract
While there has been substantial research into the use of online calendar systems (OCS) within organizations and families with children, no research focuses on adults without children. In our study, we focus on these OCS users' practices of calendar sharing as relationship work, the continually negotiated practice of managing friendships and intimacy. We conducted semi-structured interviews as part of a qualitative user study of Google Calendar users. We report the calendar sharing behaviors and strategies of our participants, who maintain multiple calendars for different purposes and with different users, communicating factual and emotional information through their calendar events. We contribute new knowledge by discussing four strategies derived from our participants' calendar sharing and relationship work activities.
Charlotte P. Lee, Katie Derthick, Alexander Thayer, Matthew J. Bietz
CSCW3
2011 The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers
abstract
While rapid growth in e-reader use is receiving much attention in industry and academia, the use of e-readers for academic reading remains understudied. This qualitative study investigates how graduate students accomplish their academic reading and integrate an e-reader into their reading practices. Our work represents the first long-term study of e-reading on a production device (the Amazon Kindle DX). In this paper we contribute new knowledge to the discussion of the academic potential of e-readers by analyzing the meta-level relationship between reading tasks and associated reading techniques, students' compensation for the limitations of e-readers, and the hindrance of the human ability to construct cognitive maps of texts when using e-readers.
Alexander Thayer, Charlotte P. Lee, Linda H. Hwang, Heidi Sales, Pausali Sen, Ninad Dalal
CHI1