Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aminreza Sefid
dblp:400/8050
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Vision and language · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › social bias
social bias in vision-language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive language-image pretraining · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object RepresentationabstractContrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models excel in zero-shot classification, yet face challenges in complex multi-object scenarios. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of CLIP’s limitations in these contexts using a specialized dataset, ComCO, designed to evaluate CLIP’s encoders in diverse multi-object scenarios. Our findings reveal significant biases: the text encoder prioritizes first-mentioned objects, and the image encoder favors larger objects. Through retrieval and classification tasks, we quantify these biases across multiple CLIP variants and trace their origins to CLIP’s training process, supported by analyses of the LAION dataset and training progression. Our image-text matching experiments show substantial performance drops when object size or token order changes, underscoring CLIP’s instability with rephrased but semantically similar captions. Extending this to longer captions and text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion, we demonstrate how prompt order influences object prominence in generated images. For more details and access to our dataset and analysis code, visit our project repository: https://clip-oscope.github.io/. Reza Abbasi, Aminreza Sefid, Mohammadali Banayeeanzade, Mohammad H. Rohban, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah |
CVPR | 3 |