Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aminreza Sefid

dblp:400/8050 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Vision and language · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › social bias
social bias in vision-language models
0.912025
CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model analysis
0.912025
CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive language-image pretraining · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation
abstract
Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models excel in zero-shot classification, yet face challenges in complex multi-object scenarios. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of CLIP’s limitations in these contexts using a specialized dataset, ComCO, designed to evaluate CLIP’s encoders in diverse multi-object scenarios. Our findings reveal significant biases: the text encoder prioritizes first-mentioned objects, and the image encoder favors larger objects. Through retrieval and classification tasks, we quantify these biases across multiple CLIP variants and trace their origins to CLIP’s training process, supported by analyses of the LAION dataset and training progression. Our image-text matching experiments show substantial performance drops when object size or token order changes, underscoring CLIP’s instability with rephrased but semantically similar captions. Extending this to longer captions and text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion, we demonstrate how prompt order influences object prominence in generated images. For more details and access to our dataset and analysis code, visit our project repository: https://clip-oscope.github.io/.
Reza Abbasi, Aminreza Sefid, Mohammadali Banayeeanzade, Mohammad H. Rohban, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah
CVPR3