Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zongrui Suo
dblp:401/6054
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 44% Language models and text generation · 28% Reinforcement learning · 28% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized Reasoners · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph reasoning
graph reasoning with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized Reasoners · KDD (2) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized Reasoners · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized Reasoners · KDD (2) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized Reasoners · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized Reasoners · KDD (2) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
process reward modeling · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rewarding Graph Reasoning Process makes LLMs more Generalized ReasonersabstractDespite significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), developing advanced reasoning capabilities in LLMs remains a key challenge. Process Reward Models (PRMs) have demonstrated exceptional promise in enhancing reasoning by providing step-wise feedback, particularly in the context of mathematical reasoning. However, their application to broader reasoning domains remains understudied, largely due to the high costs associated with manually creating step-level supervision. In this work, we explore the potential of PRMs in graph reasoning problems - a domain that demands sophisticated multi-step reasoning and offers opportunities for automated step-level data generation using established graph algorithms. We introduce GraphSilo, the largest dataset for graph reasoning problems with fine-grained step-wise label, built using automated Task-oriented Trajectories and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to generate detailed reasoning steps with step-wise labels. Building upon this dataset, we train GraphPRM, the first PRM designed for graph reasoning problems, and evaluate its effectiveness in two key settings: inference-time scaling and reinforcement learning via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Experimental results show that GraphPRM significantly improves LLM performance across 13 graph reasoning tasks, delivering a 9% gain for Qwen2.5-7B and demonstrating transferability to new graph reasoning datasets and new reasoning domains like mathematical problem-solving. Notably, GraphPRM enhances LLM performance on GSM8K and MATH500, underscoring the cross-domain applicability of graph-based reasoning rewards. Our findings highlight the potential of PRMs in advancing reasoning across diverse domains, paving the way for more versatile and effective LLMs. Miao Peng, Nuo Chen 0001, Zongrui Suo, Jia Li 0009 |
KDD (2) | 3 |