Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yeguo Hua
dblp:402/2123
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 72% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% Language models and text generation · 6% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AdaGen: Learning Adaptive Policy for Image Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AdaGen: Learning Adaptive Policy for Image Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › discrete representation learning
discrete tokenization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CODA: Repurposing Continuous VAEs for Discrete Tokenization · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CODA: Repurposing Continuous VAEs for Discrete Tokenization · ICCV 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
tokenization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | CODA: Repurposing Continuous VAEs for Discrete Tokenization · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0markov decision process · 1.0adversarial reward · 1.0continuous VAE repurposing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AdaGen: Learning Adaptive Policy for Image SynthesisabstractRecent advances in image synthesis have been propelled by powerful generative models, such as Masked Generative Transformers (MaskGIT), autoregressive models, diffusion models, and rectified flow models. A common principle behind their success is the decomposition of complex synthesis tasks into multiple tractable steps. However, this introduces a proliferation of step-specific parameters to be configured for modulating the iterative generation process (e.g., mask ratio, noise level, or temperature at each step). Existing approaches typically rely on manually-designed scheduling rules to manage this complexity, demanding expert knowledge and extensive trial-and-error. Furthermore, these static schedules lack the flexibility to adapt to the unique characteristics of each individual sample, yielding sub-optimal performance. To address this issue, we present AdaGen, a general, learnable, and sample-adaptive framework for scheduling the iterative generation process. Specifically, we formulate the scheduling problem as a Markov Decision Process, where a lightweight policy network is introduced to adaptively determine the most suitable parameters given the current generation state, and can be trained through reinforcement learning. Importantly, we demonstrate that simple reward designs, such as FID or pre-trained reward models, can be easily hacked and may not reliably guarantee the desired quality or diversity of generated samples. Therefore, we propose an adversarial reward design to guide the training of the policy networks effectively. Finally, we introduce an inference-time refinement strategy and a controllable fidelity-diversity trade-off mechanism to further enhance the performance and flexibility of AdaGen. Comprehensive experiments across five benchmark datasets (ImageNet-256 × 256 & 512 × 512, MS-COCO, CC3M, and LAION-5B) and four distinct generative paradigms validate the superiority of AdaGen . For example, AdaGen achieves better performance on DiT-XL with $\mathbf {\sim 3\times }$∼3× lower inference cost and improves the FID of VAR from 1.92 to 1.59 with negligible additional computational overhead. Zanlin Ni, Yulin Wang 0002, Yeguo Hua, Renping Zhou, Bo Zheng 0007, Gao Huang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2025 | CODA: Repurposing Continuous VAEs for Discrete Tokenization
Zanlin Ni, Yeguo Hua, Xiao Ma 0006, Gao Huang 0001 |
ICCV | 3 |