Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shalini Maiti

dblp:402/5355 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 50% Image and video coding · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
quality assessment
0.912025
Gen3DEval: Using vLLMs for Automatic Evaluation of Generated 3D Objects · CVPR 2025
Visual content generation and editing › 3d content generation
text-to-3d generation
0.912025
Gen3DEval: Using vLLMs for Automatic Evaluation of Generated 3D Objects · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.312025
Gen3DEval: Using vLLMs for Automatic Evaluation of Generated 3D Objects · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision large language model · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Gen3DEval: Using vLLMs for Automatic Evaluation of Generated 3D Objects
abstract
Rapid advancements in text-to-3D generation require robust and scalable evaluation metrics that align closely with human judgment, a need unmet by current metrics such as PSNR and CLIP, which require ground-truth data or focus only on prompt fidelity. To address this, we introduce Gen3DEval, a novel evaluation framework that leverages vision large language models (vLLMs) specifically fine-tuned for 3D object quality assessment. Gen3DEval evaluates text fidelity, appearance, and surface quality by analyzing 3D surface normals, without requiring ground-truth comparisons, bridging the gap between automated metrics and user preferences. Compared to state-of-the-art task-agnostic models, Gen3DEval demonstrates superior performance in user-aligned evaluations, placing it as a comprehensive and accessible benchmark for future research on text-to-3D generation. The project page can be found here: https://shalini-maiti.github.io/gen3deval.github.io/.
Shalini Maiti, Lourdes Agapito, Filippos Kokkinos
CVPR1