Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiajie Hong
dblp:402/7177
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-0755-3847ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs › link prediction › relation prediction
inductive relation prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Logic-Aware Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Structural Sparsity under Large Language Model Supervision · WWW 2025 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Logic-Aware Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Structural Sparsity under Large Language Model Supervision · WWW 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9graph convolutional network · 0.9first-order logic rules · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Logic-Aware Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Structural Sparsity under Large Language Model SupervisionabstractKnowledge Graph (KG) reasoning aims to predict missing entities in incomplete triples, which requires adequate structural information to derive accurate embeddings. However, KGs in the real world are not as dense as the idealized benchmarks, where sparse graph structures restrict the comprehensive structural information for superior performance. Although the logical semantics in KGs shows its potential in alleviating the impact of structural sparsity, there still exist some challenges. The deficient supervision and the semantic gap of logic make it difficult to introduce logical semantics in sparse KG reasoning. To this end, we propose a novel KG reasoning approach LoLLM injecting logic with the supervised information supplied by the Large Language Model (LLM), which is proved to be effective in evaluating and scoring. Firstly, LoLLM derives structural embeddings employing a graph convolutional network (GCN) with relation-aware and triple-aware attention. LoLLM secondly constructs reasoning paths instantiated from the first-order logic rules extracted from sparse KGs, and injects the logical semantics by a designed LLM-enhanced tuning strategy. We propose a textual loss (TL) and a logical loss (LL) in the optimization and obtain logical tuning embeddings of KG in this process. Finally, LoLLM fuses structural embeddings from the GCN and logical tuning embeddings from the LLM-enhanced tuning for scoring and incomplete triple prediction. Extensive experiments on two sparse KGs and a benchmark show that LoLLM outperforms state-of-the-art structure-based and Language Model (LM)-augmented baselines. Moreover, the logic rules with corresponding confidences provide explicit explanations as an interpretable paradigm. Yudai Pan, Jiajie Hong, Tianzhe Zhao, Lingyun Song, Jun Liu 0002, Xuequn Shang 0001 |
WWW | 2 |