Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Wilk

dblp:402/7245 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-9937-0610ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › argument generation
counter narrative generation
0.912025
Fact-based Counter Narrative Generation to Combat Hate Speech · WWW 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
hate speech
0.912025
Fact-based Counter Narrative Generation to Combat Hate Speech · WWW 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

web search · 0.9retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9LLM-based evaluation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Fact-based Counter Narrative Generation to Combat Hate Speech
abstract
Online hatred has become an increasingly pervasive issue, affecting individuals and communities across various digital platforms. To combat hate speech in such platforms, counter narratives (CNs) are regarded as an effective method. In recent years, there has been growing interest in using generative AI tools to construct CNs. However, most of the generative models produce generic responses to hate speech and can hallucinate, reducing their effectiveness. To address the above limitations, we propose a counter narrative generation method that enhances CNs by providing non-aggressive, fact-based narratives with relevant background knowledge from two distinct sources, including a web search module. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation using multiple metrics, including LLM-based measures for persuasion, factuality, and informativeness, along with human and traditional NLP evaluations. Our method significantly outperforms baselines, achieving an average factuality score of 0.915, compared to 0.741, 0.701, and 0.69 for competitive baselines, and performs well in human evaluations.
Brian Wilk, Homaira Huda Shomee, Suman Kalyan Maity, Sourav Medya
WWW1