Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Wilk
dblp:402/7245
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-9937-0610ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › argument generation
counter narrative generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fact-based Counter Narrative Generation to Combat Hate Speech · WWW 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
hate speech |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fact-based Counter Narrative Generation to Combat Hate Speech · WWW 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
web search · 0.9retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9LLM-based evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fact-based Counter Narrative Generation to Combat Hate SpeechabstractOnline hatred has become an increasingly pervasive issue, affecting individuals and communities across various digital platforms. To combat hate speech in such platforms, counter narratives (CNs) are regarded as an effective method. In recent years, there has been growing interest in using generative AI tools to construct CNs. However, most of the generative models produce generic responses to hate speech and can hallucinate, reducing their effectiveness. To address the above limitations, we propose a counter narrative generation method that enhances CNs by providing non-aggressive, fact-based narratives with relevant background knowledge from two distinct sources, including a web search module. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation using multiple metrics, including LLM-based measures for persuasion, factuality, and informativeness, along with human and traditional NLP evaluations. Our method significantly outperforms baselines, achieving an average factuality score of 0.915, compared to 0.741, 0.701, and 0.69 for competitive baselines, and performs well in human evaluations. Brian Wilk, Homaira Huda Shomee, Suman Kalyan Maity, Sourav Medya |
WWW | 1 |