Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sankalp Sethi

dblp:402/9940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-8708-0876ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 77% Human-AI interaction · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › user-centered design
persona development
1.012026
Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 Articles · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scoping review · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 Articles
abstract
As generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly applied in persona development to represent real users, understanding the implications and limitations of this technology is essential for establishing robust practices. This scoping review analyzes how 81 articles (2022-2025) use GenAI techniques for the creation, evaluation, and application of personas. The articles exhibited good level of reproducibility, with 61% of articles sharing resources (personas, code, or datasets). Furthermore, conversational persona interfaces are increasingly provided alongside traditional profiles. However, nearly half (45%) of the articles lack evaluation, and the majority (86%) use only GPT models. In some articles, GenAI use creates a risk of circularity, in which the same GenAI model both generates and evaluates outputs. Our findings also suggest that GenAI seems to reduce the role of human developers in the persona-creation process. To mitigate the associated risks, we propose actionable guidelines for the responsible integration of GenAI into persona development.
Danial Amin 0001, Joni Salminen, Farhan Ahmed, Sonja M. H. Tervola, Sankalp Sethi, Jim Jansen
CHI5