Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Favour Jacob

dblp:404/5563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
robot-assisted living
0.312025
A Robot Tour Guide for People with Sight Loss in a Robotic Assisted Living Environment · HRI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

within-subjects study · 0.9multimodal interaction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Robot Tour Guide for People with Sight Loss in a Robotic Assisted Living Environment
abstract
Robotic assisted living environments are currently lacking in accessibility for individuals with sight loss. To address this need, this preliminary study designs and evaluates a bespoke robotic tour guide which provides meaningful firsttime interactions for people with sight loss in a robotic assisted living lab. We engaged 8 participants with sight loss between the ages of 20 and 80 years old, in a counterbalanced, withinsubjects study comparing their experiences of a guided tour of a robotic assisted living lab led by a Temi robot, to the same guided tour led by a trained human tour guide. Results show that the robotic tour guide for people with sight loss is perceived as warm and competent, with low discomfort in the human-robot interaction. Findings also show that the tour guided by the robot is perceived to be equally engaging and useful as the tour led by the trained human tour guide, and does not lead to an increase in workload. Key findings highlight the importance of tactile exploration, multimodal interaction, and enhanced control, and identify differing needs between users who are blind and partially sighted,
Shenando Stals, Lynne Baillie, Favour Jacob
HRI3