Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Favour Jacob
dblp:404/5563
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
robot-assisted living |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Robot Tour Guide for People with Sight Loss in a Robotic Assisted Living Environment · HRI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
within-subjects study · 0.9multimodal interaction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Robot Tour Guide for People with Sight Loss in a Robotic Assisted Living EnvironmentabstractRobotic assisted living environments are currently lacking in accessibility for individuals with sight loss. To address this need, this preliminary study designs and evaluates a bespoke robotic tour guide which provides meaningful firsttime interactions for people with sight loss in a robotic assisted living lab. We engaged 8 participants with sight loss between the ages of 20 and 80 years old, in a counterbalanced, withinsubjects study comparing their experiences of a guided tour of a robotic assisted living lab led by a Temi robot, to the same guided tour led by a trained human tour guide. Results show that the robotic tour guide for people with sight loss is perceived as warm and competent, with low discomfort in the human-robot interaction. Findings also show that the tour guided by the robot is perceived to be equally engaging and useful as the tour led by the trained human tour guide, and does not lead to an increase in workload. Key findings highlight the importance of tactile exploration, multimodal interaction, and enhanced control, and identify differing needs between users who are blind and partially sighted, Shenando Stals, Lynne Baillie, Favour Jacob |
HRI | 3 |