Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elijah Kwasa

dblp:404/7147 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5744-3951ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics
clinical AI
0.912025
Towards Clinically Useful AI: From Radiology Practices in Global South and North to Visions of AI Support · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025
Health and well-being technologies › health informatics
clinical decision support
0.912025
Towards Clinically Useful AI: From Radiology Practices in Global South and North to Visions of AI Support · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interviews · 1.7field study · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards Clinically Useful AI: From Radiology Practices in Global South and North to Visions of AI Support
abstract
Despite recent advancements, real-world use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in radiology remains low, often due to the mismatch between AI offerings and the situated challenges faced by healthcare professionals. To bridge this gap, we conducted a field study at nine medical sites in Denmark and Kenya with two goals: (1) to understand the challenges faced by radiologists during chest X-ray practice and (2) to envision alternative AI futures that align with collaborative clinical work. This study uniquely grounds the AI design insights in the comprehensive characterisation of diagnostic work across multiple geographical and institutional contexts. Building on ideas articulated by interviewed radiologists (N = 18), we conceptualised five visions that transcend the traditional notions of AI support. These visions emphasise that the clinical usefulness of AI-based systems depends on their configurability and flexibility across three dimensions: type of clinical site, expertise of medical professionals, and situational and patient contexts. Addressing these dependencies requires expanding the clinical AI design space by envisioning futures rooted in the realities of practice rather than solely following the trajectory of AI development.
Hubert Dariusz Zajac, Tariq Osman Andersen, Elijah Kwasa, Ruth Wanjohi, Mary K. Onyinkwa, Edward K. Mwaniki, Samuel N. Gitau, Shawnim S. Yaseen, Jonathan Frederik Carlsen, Marco Fraccaro, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Yunan Chen 0001
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.3