Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Filippo Casagrande
dblp:405/2038
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-6916-9289ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Distributed computing theory · 60% Quantum computing and quantum information · 26% Computational complexity · 13% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed computing theory
distributed graph algorithms |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | Distributed Quantum Advantage in Locally Checkable Labeling Problems · SODA 2026 New Hardness Results for the LOCAL Model via a Simple Self-Reduction · PODC 2026 |
Distributed computing theory › local algorithms
locally checkable labeling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Distributed Quantum Advantage in Locally Checkable Labeling Problems · SODA 2026 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | New Hardness Results for the LOCAL Model via a Simple Self-Reduction · PODC 2026 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum advantage |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Distributed Quantum Advantage in Locally Checkable Labeling Problems · SODA 2026 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum network
quantum distributed computing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Distributed Quantum Advantage in Locally Checkable Labeling Problems · SODA 2026 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
round elimination |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | New Hardness Results for the LOCAL Model via a Simple Self-Reduction · PODC 2026 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
LOCAL model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | New Hardness Results for the LOCAL Model via a Simple Self-Reduction · PODC 2026 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
maximal matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | New Hardness Results for the LOCAL Model via a Simple Self-Reduction · PODC 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-reduction · 1.0quantum communication · 1.0distributed algorithm design · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | New Hardness Results for the LOCAL Model via a Simple Self-ReductionabstractVery recently, Khoury and Schild [FOCS 2025] showed that any randomized LOCAL algorithm that solves maximal matching requires Ω(min{log Δ, logΔ n}) rounds, where n is the number of nodes in the graph and Δ is the maximum degree. This result is shown through a new technique, called round elimination via self-reduction. The lower bound proof is beautiful and presents very nice ideas. However, it spans more than 25 pages of technical details, and hence it is hard to digest and generalize to other problems. Alkida Balliu, Filippo Casagrande, Francesco d'Amore 0001, Dennis Olivetti |
PODC | 2 |
| 2026 | Distributed Quantum Advantage in Locally Checkable Labeling Problems
Alkida Balliu, Filippo Casagrande, Francesco d'Amore 0001, Massimo Equi, Barbara Keller, Henrik Lievonen, Dennis Olivetti, Gustav Schmid, Jukka Suomela |
SODA | 2 |
| 2025 | Orientation Does Not Help with 3-Coloring a Grid in Online-LOCALabstractThe online-LOCAL and SLOCAL models are extensions of the LOCAL model where nodes are processed in a sequential but potentially adversarial order. So far, the only problem we know of where the global memory of the online-LOCAL model has an advantage over SLOCAL is 3-coloring bipartite graphs. Recently, Chang et al. [PODC 2024] showed that even in grids, 3-coloring requires Ω(log n) locality in deterministic online-LOCAL. This result was subsequently extended by Akbari et al. [STOC 2025] to also hold in randomized online-LOCAL. However, both proofs heavily rely on the assumption that the algorithm does not have access to the orientation of the underlying grid. In this paper, we show how to lift this requirement and obtain the same lower bound (against either model) even when the algorithm is explicitly given a globally consistent orientation of the grid. Thomas Boudier, Filippo Casagrande, Avinandan Das, Massimo Equi, Henrik Lievonen, Augusto Modanese, Ronja Stimpert |
OPODIS | 2 |