We propose a symbolic generative task description language and a corresponding inference engine capable of representing arbitrary multimodal tasks as structured symbolic flows. Unlike conventional generative models that rely on large-scale training and implicit neural representations to learn cross-modal mappings—often at high computational cost and with limited flexibility—our framework introduces an explicit symbolic representation comprising three core primitives: $\color{blue}{\text{functions}}$, $\color{green}{\text{parameters}}$, and $\color {Purple}{\text{topological}}\,{\text{logic}}$. Leveraging a pre-trained language model, our inference engine maps natural language instructions directly to symbolic workflows in a training-free manner. Our framework successfully performs over 12 diverse multimodal generative tasks, demonstrating strong performance and flexibility without the need for task-specific tuning. Experiments show that our method not only matches or outperforms existing state-of-the-art unified models in content quality, but also offers greater efficiency, editability, and interruptibility. We believe that symbolic task representations provide a cost-effective and extensible foundation for advancing the capabilities of generative AI.

Video generation assessment is essential for ensuring that generative models produce visually realistic, high-quality videos while aligning with human expectations. Current video generation benchmarks fall into two main categories: traditional benchmarks, which use metrics and embeddings to evaluate generated video quality across multiple dimensions but often lack alignment with human judgments; and large language model (LLM)-based benchmarks, though capable of human-like reasoning, are constrained by a limited understanding of video quality metrics and cross-modal consistency. To address these challenges and establish a benchmark that better aligns with human preferences, this paper introduces Video-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark featuring a rich prompt suite and extensive evaluation dimensions. This benchmark represents the first attempt to systematically leverage MLLMs across all dimensions relevant to video generation assessment in generative models. By incorporating few-shot scoring and chain-of-query techniques, Video-Bench provides a structured, scalable approach to generated video evaluation. Experiments on advanced models including Sora demonstrate that Video-bench achieve superior alignment with human preferences across all dimensions. Moreover, in instances where our framework’s assessments diverge from human evaluations, it consistently offers more objective and accurate insights, suggesting an even greater potential advantage over traditional human judgment.

Large language models (LLMs) hold promise for therapeutic interventions, yet most existing datasets rely solely on text, overlooking nonverbal emotional cues essential to real-world therapy.To address this, we introduce a multimodal dataset of 1,441 publicly sourced therapy session videos containing both dialogue and non-verbal signals such as facial expressions and vocal tone.Inspired by Hochschild's concept of emotional labor, we propose a computational formulation of emotional dissonance-the mismatch between facial and vocal emotion-and use it to guide emotionally aware prompting.Our experiments show that integrating multimodal cues, especially dissonance, improves the quality of generated interventions.We also find that LLM-based evaluators misalign with expert assessments in this domain, highlighting the need for humancentered evaluation.Project page link: https: //kilichbek.github.io/webpage/mental/