Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amanda Perez
dblp:405/3091
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentially Private Selection Using Smooth Sensitivity · SP 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design › sensitivity analysis
smooth sensitivity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentially Private Selection Using Smooth Sensitivity · SP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
smooth sensitivity · 0.9differential privacy · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differentially Private Selection Using Smooth SensitivityabstractDifferentially private selection mechanisms offer strong privacy guarantees for queries aiming to identify the top-scoring element$r$from a finite set$\mathfrak{R}$, based on a dataset-dependent utility function. While selection queries are fundamental in data science, few mechanisms effectively ensure their privacy. Furthermore, most approaches rely on global sensitivity to achieve differential privacy (DP), which can introduce excessive noise and impair downstream inferences. To address this limitation, we propose the Smooth Noisy Max (SNM) mechanism, which leverages smooth sensitivity to yield provably tighter (upper bounds on) expected errors compared to global sensitivity-based methods. Empirical results demonstrate that SNM is more accurate than state-of-the-art differentially private selection methods in three applications: percentile selection, greedy decision trees, and random forests. Iago C. Chaves, Victor A. E. de Farias, Amanda Perez, Diego Mesquita, Javam C. Machado |
SP | 3 |