Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amanda Perez

dblp:405/3091 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.912025
Differentially Private Selection Using Smooth Sensitivity · SP 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design › sensitivity analysis
smooth sensitivity
0.912025
Differentially Private Selection Using Smooth Sensitivity · SP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smooth sensitivity · 0.9differential privacy · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Differentially Private Selection Using Smooth Sensitivity
abstract
Differentially private selection mechanisms offer strong privacy guarantees for queries aiming to identify the top-scoring element$r$from a finite set$\mathfrak{R}$, based on a dataset-dependent utility function. While selection queries are fundamental in data science, few mechanisms effectively ensure their privacy. Furthermore, most approaches rely on global sensitivity to achieve differential privacy (DP), which can introduce excessive noise and impair downstream inferences. To address this limitation, we propose the Smooth Noisy Max (SNM) mechanism, which leverages smooth sensitivity to yield provably tighter (upper bounds on) expected errors compared to global sensitivity-based methods. Empirical results demonstrate that SNM is more accurate than state-of-the-art differentially private selection methods in three applications: percentile selection, greedy decision trees, and random forests.
Iago C. Chaves, Victor A. E. de Farias, Amanda Perez, Diego Mesquita, Javam C. Machado
SP3