Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Konstantin Kruff

dblp:407/6923 · also Andreas Kruff · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-8350-154XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › evaluation
user simulation
1.722025
Second SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025) · SIGIR 2025
Evaluating Contrastive Feedback for Effective User Simulations · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
1.122025
Second SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025) · SIGIR 2025
Evaluating Contrastive Feedback for Effective User Simulations · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
interactive information retrieval
1.122025
Evaluating Contrastive Feedback for Effective User Simulations · SIGIR 2025
Second SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025) · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation › offline evaluation
simulation-based evaluation
0.912025
Second SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025) · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.9prompt engineering · 0.9large language model · 0.9contrastive training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Evaluating Information Retrieval Models Along Time: The LongEval Lab at CLEF 2026
Timo Breuer 0002, Matteo Cancellieri, Alaa El-Ebshihy, Maik Fröbe, Petra Galuscáková, Lorraine Goeuriot, Gabriel Iturra-Bocaz, Jüri Keller, Petr Knoth, Andreas Konstantin Kruff, Philippe Mulhem, Florina Piroi, David Pride, Philipp Schaer, Didier Schwab
ECIR (4)10
2026 LISP - A Rich Interaction Dataset and Loggable Interactive Search Platform
Jana Isabelle Friese, Andreas Konstantin Kruff, Philipp Schaer, Norbert Fuhr, Nicola Ferro 0001
ECIR (4)2
2026 Validating Search Query Simulations: A Taxonomy of Measures
Andreas Konstantin Kruff, Nolwenn Bernard, Philipp Schaer
ECIR (1)1
2026 Sim4IA-Bench: A User Simulation Benchmark Suite for Next Query and Utterance Prediction
Andreas Konstantin Kruff, Christin Kreutz, Timo Breuer 0002, Philipp Schaer, Krisztian Balog
ECIR (4)1
2025 Evaluating Contrastive Feedback for Effective User Simulations
abstract
The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for simulating user behavior in the domain of Interactive Information Retrieval has recently gained significant popularity. However, their application and capabilities remain highly debated and understudied. This study explores whether the underlying principles of contrastive training techniques, which have been effective for fine-tuning LLMs, can also be applied beneficially in the area of prompt engineering for user simulations.
Andreas Konstantin Kruff, Timo Breuer 0002, Philipp Schaer
SIGIR1
2025 Second SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025)
abstract
Simulations in information access (IA) have recently gained interest, as shown by various tutorials and workshops around that topic. Simulations can be key contributors to central IA research and evaluation questions, especially around interactive settings when real users are unavailable, or their participation is impossible due to ethical reasons. In addition, simulations in IA can help contribute to a better understanding of users, reduce complexity of evaluation experiments, and improve reproducibility. Building on recent developments in methods and toolkits, the second iteration of our Sim4IA workshop aims to again bring together researchers and practitioners to form an interactive and engaging forum for discussions on the future perspectives of the field. An additional aim is to plan an upcoming TREC/CLEF campaign.
Philipp Schaer, Christin Kreutz, Krisztian Balog, Timo Breuer 0002, Andreas Konstantin Kruff
SIGIR5