Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huibin Xiao
dblp:407/9291
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 33% Learning theory · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
classifier training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BCE vs. CE in Deep Feature Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BCE vs. CE in Deep Feature Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BCE vs. CE in Deep Feature Learning · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
theoretical analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BCE vs. CE in Deep Feature LearningabstractWhen training classification models, it expects that the learned features are compact within classes, and can well separate different classes. As the dominant loss function for training classification models, minimizing cross-entropy (CE) loss maximizes the compactness and distinctiveness, i.e., reaching neural collapse (NC). The recent works show that binary CE (BCE) performs also well in multi-class tasks. In this paper, we compare BCE and CE in deep feature learning. For the first time, we prove that BCE can also maximize the intra-class compactness and inter-class distinctiveness when reaching its minimum, i.e., leading to NC. We point out that CE measures the relative values of decision scores in the model training, implicitly enhancing the feature properties by classifying samples one-by-one. In contrast, BCE measures the absolute values of decision scores and adjust the positive/negative decision scores across all samples to uniformly high/low levels. Meanwhile, the classifier biases in BCE present a substantial constraint on the decision scores to explicitly enhance the feature properties in the training. The experimental results are aligned with above analysis, and show that BCE could improve the classification and leads to better compactness and distinctiveness among sample features. The codes have be released. Qiufu Li, Huibin Xiao, LinLin Shen |
ICML | 2 |