Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ethan Huang

dblp:408/5563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 45% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Language models and text generation · 20%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
1.012026
Second-Order Bounds for [0, 1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
1.012026
Second-Order Bounds for [0, 1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
second-order bounds
1.012026
Second-Order Bounds for [0, 1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss · COLT 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
reasoning robustness
0.912025
How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled Benchmark · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › cost-sensitive learning
cost-sensitive classification
0.312026
Second-Order Bounds for [0, 1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss · COLT 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
tree search
0.312025
How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled Benchmark · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance-adaptive bound · 1.0log loss · 1.0betting loss · 1.0symbolic reasoning graphs · 0.9process reward model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Second-Order Bounds for [0, 1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss
abstract
We consider the $[0,1]$-valued regression problem in the stochastic setting. In a related problem called cost-sensitive classification, Foster and Krishnamurthy (2021) have shown that the log loss minimizer achieves an improved generalization bound compared to that of the squared loss minimizer in the sense that the bound scales with the cost of the best classifier, which can be arbitrarily small depending on the problem instance. Such a result is often called a first-order bound. For $[0,1]$-valued regression, we first show that the log loss minimizer leads to a similar first-order bound. We then ask if there exists a loss function that achieves a variance-dependent bound, also known as a second-order bound, which is a strict improvement upon first-order bounds. We answer this question in the affirmative by proposing a novel loss function called betting loss. Our result is variance-adaptive in the sense that the bound is attained by an algorithm without any knowledge about the variance, which is in contrast to the existing works such as weighted least squares with known variances or those that model label variance or its distribution such as distributional reinforcement learning.
Sungjoon Yoon, Ethan Huang, Kwang-Sung Jun
COLT3
2025 How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled Benchmark
abstract
We introduce Grade School Math with Distracting Context (GSM-DC 1 ), a synthetic benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning robustness against systematically controlled irrelevant context (IC).GSM-DC constructs symbolic reasoning graphs with precise distractor injections, enabling rigorous, reproducible evaluation.Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs are significantly sensitive to IC, affecting both reasoning path selection and arithmetic accuracy.Additionally, training models with strong distractors improves performance in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios.We further propose a stepwise tree search guided by a process reward model, which notably enhances robustness in out-of-distribution conditions.
Minglai Yang 0002, Ethan Huang, Mihai Surdeanu, William Yang Wang, Liangming Pan
EMNLP2