Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vlad Killiakov
dblp:409/9816
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 62% Efficient and distributed learning · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Eigenspectrum Analysis of Neural Networks without Aspect Ratio Bias · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
language model pruning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Eigenspectrum Analysis of Neural Networks without Aspect Ratio Bias · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Eigenspectrum Analysis of Neural Networks without Aspect Ratio Bias · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fixed-aspect-ratio matrix subsampling · 0.9empirical spectral density analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Eigenspectrum Analysis of Neural Networks without Aspect Ratio BiasabstractDiagnosing deep neural networks (DNNs) by analyzing the eigenspectrum of their weights has been an active area of research in recent years. One of the main approaches involves measuring the heavytailness of the empirical spectral densities (ESDs) of weight matrices. This analysis has been shown to provide insights to help diagnose whether a model is well-trained or undertrained, and has been used to guide training methods involving layer-wise hyperparameter assignment. In this paper, we address an often-overlooked challenge in estimating the heavytailness of these ESDs: the impact of the aspect ratio of weight matrices. We demonstrate that matrices of varying sizes (and aspect ratios) introduce a non-negligible bias in estimating the heavytailness of ESDs, leading to inaccurate model diagnosis and layer-wise hyperparameter assignment. To overcome this challenge, we propose FARMS (Fixed-Aspect-Ratio Matrix Subsampling), a method that normalizes the weight matrices by subsampling submatrices with a fixed aspect ratio. Instead of measuring the heavytailness of the original ESD, we measure the average ESD of these subsampled submatrices. We show that this method effectively mitigates the aspect ratio bias. We validate our approach across various optimization techniques and application domains that involve eigenspectrum analysis of weights, including image classification in computer vision (CV) models, scientific machine learning (SciML) model training, and large language model (LLM) pruning. Our results show that despite its simplicity, FARMS uniformly improves the accuracy of eigenspectrum analysis while enabling more effective layer-wise hyperparameter assignment. In one of the LLM pruning experiments, FARMS reduces the perplexity of the LLaMA-7B model by 17.3% when compared with state-of-the-art methods. Kinshuk Goel, Vlad Killiakov, Yaoqing Yang 0002 |
ICML | 3 |