Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pascal Teissier

dblp:41/3612 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 67% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimodal fusion
audio-visual fusion
0.011999
Comparing models for audiovisual fusion in a noisy-vowel recognition task · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1999
Audio and music processing › speech recognition
audio-visual speech recognition
0.011999
Comparing models for audiovisual fusion in a noisy-vowel recognition task · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1999
Audio and music processing
speech recognition
0.011999
Comparing models for audiovisual fusion in a noisy-vowel recognition task · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision-to-decision fusion · 0.0data-to-decision fusion · 0.0data-to-data fusion · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Comparing models for audiovisual fusion in a noisy-vowel recognition task
abstract
Audiovisual speech recognition involves fusion of the audio and video sensors for phonetic identification. There are three basic ways to fuse data streams for taking a decision such as phoneme identification: data-to-decision, decision-to-decision, and data-to-data. This leads to four possible models for audiovisual speech recognition, that is direct identification in the first case, separate identification in the second one, and two variants of the third early integration case, namely dominant recoding or motor recoding. However, no systematic comparison of these models is available in the literature. We propose an implementation of these four models, and submit them to a benchmark test. For this aim, we use a noisy-vowel corpus tested on two recognition paradigms in which the systems are tested at noise levels higher than those used for learning. In one of these paradigms, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) value is provided to the recognition systems, in the other it is not. We also introduce a new criterion for evaluating performances, based on transmitted information on individual phonetic features. In light of the compared performances of the four models with the two recognition paradigms, we discuss the advantages and drawbacks of these models, leading to proposals for data representation, fusion architecture, and control of the fusion process through sensor reliability.
Pascal Teissier, Jordi Robert-Ribes, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Anne Guérin-Dugué
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
1997 Non-linear representations, sensor reliability estimation and context-dependent fusion in the audiovisual recognition of speech in noise
abstract
The paper involves the recognition of French audiovisual vowels at various signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). It deals with a new non-linear preprocessing of the audio data which enables an estimation of the reliability of the audio sensor in relation to SNR, and a significant increase in the recognition performances at the output of the fusion process.
Pascal Teissier, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Anne Guérin-Dugué
EUROSPEECH1
1997 Models for audiovisual fusion in a noisy-vowel recognition task
abstract
This paper presents a comparison of four basic architectures dealing with audiovisual speech in a noisy-vowel recognition task. Provided contextual input (signal-to-noise ratio), three of the four architectures respect the "synergy" criterion which means that audiovisual (AV) recognition is better than audio-alone (A) or visual-alone (V) recognition, both in global terms and for each individual phonetic feature. Without contextual input, the performances collapse, but we propose for one model an original approach using an efficient non-linear data processing which leads to more simple algorithms and increases performances of the audiovisual fusion operator.
Pascal Teissier, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Anne Guérin-Dugué
MMSP1