Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hanne Raum

dblp:410/3968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Image recognition and object detection · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.912025
Salvage: Shapley-distribution Approximation Learning Via Attribution Guided Exploration for Explainable Image Classification · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Salvage: Shapley-distribution Approximation Learning Via Attribution Guided Exploration for Explainable Image Classification · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable image classification
0.912025
Salvage: Shapley-distribution Approximation Learning Via Attribution Guided Exploration for Explainable Image Classification · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › post-hoc explanation
removal-based explanation
0.912025
Salvage: Shapley-distribution Approximation Learning Via Attribution Guided Exploration for Explainable Image Classification · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shapley value · 0.9informed sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Salvage: Shapley-distribution Approximation Learning Via Attribution Guided Exploration for Explainable Image Classification
abstract
The integration of deep learning into critical vision application areas has given rise to a necessity for techniques that can explain the rationale behind predictions. In this paper, we address this need by introducing Salvage, a novel removal-based explainability method for image classification. Our approach involves training an explainer model that learns the prediction distribution of the classifier on masked images. We first introduce the concept of Shapley-distributions, which offers a more accurate approximation of classification probability distributions than existing methods. Furthermore, we address the issue of unbalanced important and unimportant features. In such settings, naive uniform sampling of feature subsets often results in a highly unbalanced ratio of samples with high and low prediction likelihoods, which can hinder effective learning. To mitigate this, we propose an informed sampling strategy that leverages approximated feature importance scores, thereby reducing imbalance and facilitating the estimation of underrepresented features. After incorporating these two principles into our method, we conducted an extensive analysis on the ImageNette, MURA, WBC, and Pet datasets. The results show that Salvage outperforms various baseline explainability methods, including attention-, gradient-, and removal-based approaches, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our explainer model can serve as a fully explainable classifier without a major decrease in classification performance, paving the way for fully explainable image classification.
Mehdi Naouar, Hanne Raum, Jens Rahnfeld, Yannick Vogt, Joschka Boedecker, Gabriel Kalweit, Maria Kalweit
ICLR2