Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabio Rosenthal

dblp:410/6560 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 61% Image recognition and object detection · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image cropping
0.912025
FOCUS: Internal MLLM Representations for Efficient Fine-Grained Visual Question Answering · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
FOCUS: Internal MLLM Representations for Efficient Fine-Grained Visual Question Answering · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.912025
FOCUS: Internal MLLM Representations for Efficient Fine-Grained Visual Question Answering · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization
0.312025
FOCUS: Internal MLLM Representations for Efficient Fine-Grained Visual Question Answering · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

key-value cache · 0.9attention · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 FOCUS: Internal MLLM Representations for Efficient Fine-Grained Visual Question Answering
abstract
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer strong perception and reasoning capabilities for image-text input, Visual Question Answering (VQA) focusing on small image details still remains a challenge. Although visual cropping techniques seem promising, recent approaches have several limitations: the need for task-specific fine-tuning, low efficiency due to uninformed exhaustive search, or incompatibility with efficient attention implementations. We address these shortcomings by proposing a training-free visual cropping method, dubbed FOCUS, that leverages MLLM-internal representations to guide the search for the most relevant image region. This is accomplished in four steps: first, we identify the target object(s) in the VQA prompt; second, we compute an object relevance map using the key-value (KV) cache; third, we propose and rank relevant image regions based on the map; and finally, we perform the fine-grained VQA task using the top-ranked region. As a result of this informed search strategy, FOCUS achieves strong performance across four fine-grained VQA datasets and three types of MLLMs. It outperforms three popular visual cropping methods in both accuracy and efficiency, and matches the best-performing baseline, ZoomEye, while requiring 3 – 6.5 × less compute.
Liangyu Zhong, Fabio Rosenthal, Joachim Sicking, Fabian Hüger, Thorsten Bagdonat, Hanno Gottschalk, Leo Schwinn
NeurIPS2