Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philip Toma
dblp:410/7537
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | scSSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Single-Cell Data · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | scSSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Single-Cell Data · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 1.7data augmentation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | scSSL-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Single-Cell DataabstractSelf-supervised learning (SSL) has proven to be a powerful approach for extracting biologically meaningful representations from single-cell data. To advance our understanding of SSL methods applied to single-cell data, we present scSSL-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates nineteen SSL methods. Our evaluation spans nine datasets and focuses on three common downstream tasks: batch correction, cell type annotation, and missing modality prediction. Furthermore, we systematically assess various data augmentation strategies. Our analysis reveals task-specific trade-offs: the specialized single-cell frameworks, scVI, CLAIRE, and the finetuned scGPT excel at uni-modal batch correction, while generic SSL methods, such as VICReg and SimCLR, demonstrate superior performance in cell typing and multi-modal data integration. Random masking emerges as the most effective augmentation technique across all tasks, surpassing domain-specific augmentations. Notably, our results indicate the need for a specialized single-cell multi-modal data integration framework. scSSL-Bench provides a standardized evaluation platform and concrete recommendations for applying SSL to single-cell analysis, advancing the convergence of deep learning and single-cell genomics. Olga Ovcharenko, Florian Barkmann, Philip Toma, Imant Daunhawer, Julia E. Vogt, Sebastian Schelter, Valentina Boeva |
ICML | 3 |