Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aashish Nikhil Ghosh

dblp:411/1971 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 56% Learning paradigms · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › debiasing
pseudo-label debiasing
0.912025
Language-Assisted Debiasing and Smoothing for Foundation Model-Based Semi-Supervised Learning · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.912025
Language-Assisted Debiasing and Smoothing for Foundation Model-Based Semi-Supervised Learning · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.312025
Language-Assisted Debiasing and Smoothing for Foundation Model-Based Semi-Supervised Learning · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logit adjustment · 0.9language model · 0.9foundation model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Language-Assisted Debiasing and Smoothing for Foundation Model-Based Semi-Supervised Learning
abstract
Recent studies have focused on introducing pre-trained foundation models into semi-supervised learning (SSL) tasks. Nevertheless, these foundation models can exhibit biases toward different classes and tend to generate imbalanced pseudo-labels for SSL. Thus, efforts have been made to introduce the logit adjustment offset to reduce the inherent bias in foundation models for SSL tasks. Despite their success, existing foundation model-based SSL methods face challenges: 1) unreliability in the estimated logit adjustment offset, 2) overlooking the potential of linguistic knowledge in capturing model biases and 3) fail to fully exploit the unlabeled samples. To address these issues, we propose Language-Assisted Debiasing and Smoothing framework, namely LADaS, for foundation model-based SSL. It consists of two components: 1) Language-assisted Pseudo-Label Debiasing (LPLD) to reduce biases in foundation models, and 2) Language-aware Pseudo-Label Smoothing (LPLS) to fully exploit low-confidence samples to facilitate SSL training. In particular, LPLD introduces a reliability score to dynamically assess the reliability of the logit adjustment. Additionally, it incorporates a language-oriented preference to reduce model biases using linguistic knowledge derived from pre-trained language models. Finally, LPLS introduces language-aware soft pseudo-labels and devises language-aware pseudo-label smoothing loss to guide the learning of unlabeled samples with low-quality pseudo-labels. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our proposed LADaS.
Xuemeng Song, Aashish Nikhil Ghosh, Liqiang Nie, Roger Zimmermann
CVPR4