Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunya Zhang
dblp:412/2627
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 75% Vision and language · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Instruction-Guided Cross-Modal Clustering for Training-Free Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Instruction-Guided Cross-Modal Clustering for Training-Free Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Instruction-Guided Cross-Modal Clustering for Training-Free Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › token pruning
token pruning for vision language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Instruction-Guided Cross-Modal Clustering for Training-Free Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information bottleneck attribution · 1.0cross-modal clustering · 1.0attention analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Instruction-Guided Cross-Modal Clustering for Training-Free Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language ModelsabstractLarge vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding multimodal data such as images and text. However, the number of visual tokens in these models often far exceeds that of textual tokens, resulting in substantial redundancy and high inference costs. Existing pruning methods primarily rely on either unimodal information or cross-modal attention mechanisms. The former often overlooks the semantic alignment between instructions and visual representations in the multimodal space, while the latter is prone to attention drift and dispersion, leading to significant performance degradation under high pruning ratios. All the above issues stem from the lack of effective textual guidance during the pruning process. To identify effective informational cues for guiding pruning, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the interaction between language instructions and visual features based on the cross-modal information bottleneck attribution (CIBA) method, revealing the presence of noun anchors. Based on this analysis, we propose the Instruction-Guided Cross-Modal Clustering Token Pruning (ICCTP) method, a plug-and-play, training-free pruning paradigm. Specifically, ICCTP first leverages global attention to retain a small set of visual tokens that preserve global context. It then extracts nouns from the instruction as clustering centers to perform cross-modal clustering over the remaining visual tokens. To balance semantic diversity and global relevance while reducing intra-cluster redundancy, we design an importance scoring mechanism. Finally, visual tokens within each cluster are pruned according to a specified pruning ratio. We evaluate ICCTP on multiple VLM architectures, including LLaVA-1.5-7B, LLaVA-1.5-13B, and LLaVA-NeXT-7B. Experimental results show that ICCTP maintains strong performance across various pruning rates without requiring retraining. Notably, even under an extreme setting where 94.4% of visual tokens are removed, ICCTP retains 90.02% of the original accuracy while reducing TFLOPs by 82.36%. Yunqian Yu, Yunya Zhang, Tonglan Xie, Mengmeng Jing, Lin Zuo |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | Flexible CLIP: Decoupled Vision and Auxiliary Semantics for Flexible Object Recognition
Yunya Zhang, Tonglan Xie, Jiafu Yan, Kunshan Yang, Lin Zuo |
ICIC (18) | 2 |
| 2025 | Learning Latent Representations with Codebook Priors for Single-Image Flare Removal
Shimin Luo, Yunya Zhang, Hanpu Deng, Mengmeng Jing, Lin Zuo |
ICIC (3) | 2 |