Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianshuo Wei

dblp:412/7081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-2470-6688ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 70% Efficient and distributed learning · 30%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › scientific text generation
automatic survey generation
1.012026
Bloom-Eval: A Hierarchical Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Survey Generation Based on Bloom's Taxonomy · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.912025
DANCE: Resource-Efficient Neural Architecture Search with Data-Aware and Continuous Adaptation · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bloom's taxonomy · 1.0LLM-as-a-judge · 1.0multi-stage training · 0.9continuous architecture distribution · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Bloom-Eval: A Hierarchical Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Survey Generation Based on Bloom's Taxonomy
abstract
The rapid advance of automatic survey generation (ASG) has created a critical evaluation challenge.Existing evaluation methods suffer from both cognitive dimensional simplification and methodological unreliability, primarily due to the over-reliance on the "LLM-as-a-Judge" approach.To bridge this gap, we establish Bloom-Eval, a six-tiered benchmark based on Bloom's Taxonomy that reliably evaluates ASG systems by prioritizing deterministic algorithms and introducing our GRADE approach for abstract abilities.Furthermore, we construct a large-scale, cross-disciplinary dataset of over 3,000 high-quality papers.Our empirical study on this benchmark reveals that while leading ASG systems are proficient format organizers, they remain unqualified knowledge integrators.This work aims to redefine ASG evaluation standards, shifting the research focus from the formal mimicry of surface structure to the cognitive deepening of intellectual content.Our method provides the ASG field with a systematic, reproducible, and theoretically grounded benchmark to guide future research.
Haibin Wen, Tianshuo Wei, Zaixi Zhang
ACL (1)4
2025 SPARK: Adaptive Low-Rank Knowledge Graph Modeling in Hybrid Geometric Spaces for Recommendation
abstract
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) enhance recommender systems but face challenges from inherent noise, sparsity, and Euclidean geometry's inadequacy for complex relational structures, critically impairing representation learning, especially for long-tail entities. Existing methods also often lack adaptive multi-source signal fusion tailored to item popularity. This paper introduces SPARK, a novel multi-stage framework systematically tackling these issues. SPARK first employs Tucker low-rank decomposition to denoise KGs and generate robust entity representations. Subsequently, an SVD-initialized hybrid geometric GNN concurrently learns representations in Euclidean and Hyperbolic spaces; the latter is strategically leveraged for its aptitude in modeling hierarchical structures, effectively capturing semantic features of sparse, long-tail items. A core contribution is an item popularity-aware adaptive fusion strategy that dynamically weights signals from collaborative filtering, refined KG embeddings, and diverse geometric spaces for precise modeling of both mainstream and long-tail items. Finally, contrastive learning aligns these multi-source representations. Extensive experiments demonstrate SPARK's significant superiority over state-of-the-art methods, particularly in improving long-tail item recommendation, offering a robust, principled approach to knowledge-enhanced recommendation. Implementation code is anonymously online. https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SPARK.
Binhao Wang 0001, Yutian Xiao, Maolin Wang 0001, Tianshuo Wei, Ruocheng Guo, Xiangyu Zhao 0001
CIKM5
2025 DANCE: Resource-Efficient Neural Architecture Search with Data-Aware and Continuous Adaptation
abstract
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has emerged as a powerful approach for automating neural network design. However, existing NAS methods face critical limitations in real-world deployments: architectures lack adaptability across scenarios, each deployment context requires costly separate searches, and performance consistency across diverse platforms remains challenging. We propose DANCE (Dynamic Architectures with Neural Continuous Evolution), which reformulates architecture search as a continuous evolution problem through learning distributions over architectural components. DANCE introduces three key innovations: a continuous architecture distribution enabling smooth adaptation, a unified architecture space with learned selection gates for efficient sampling, and a multi-stage training strategy for effective deployment optimization. Extensive experiments across five datasets demonstrate DANCE's effectiveness. Our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art NAS approaches in terms of accuracy while significantly reducing search costs. Under varying computational constraints, DANCE maintains robust performance while smoothly adapting architectures to different hardware requirements. The code and appendix can be found at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/DANCE.
Maolin Wang 0001, Tianshuo Wei, Sheng Zhang 0028, Ruocheng Guo, Shanshan Ye, Lixin Zou, Xuetao Wei, Xiangyu Zhao 0001
IJCAI2