Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hongxu Shen
dblp:415/3944
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
point-of-interest recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation · IJCAI 2025 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation · IJCAI 2025 |
Recommender systems › context-aware recommendation
spatio-temporal recommendation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
timestamp encoding · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential RecommendationabstractSequential point-of-interest (POI) recommendation aims to recommend the next POI for users in accordance with their historical check-in information. However, few attempts treat timestamps of check-ins as a core factor for sequence models, leading to insufficient insight into user behavior and subsequently suboptimal recommendations. To address these limitations, we propose to assign equal importance to both POIs and their timestamps, shifting the point of view to recommend the next POI and predict the corresponding timestamp. Along these lines, we present the Time-Aware POI Recommender with Timestamp Prediction (TAPT), a multi-task learning framework for explainable POI recommendations. Specifically, we begin by decoupling timestamps into multi-dimensional vectors and propose a timestamp encoding module to explicitly encode these vectors. Additionally, we design a specialized timestamp prediction module built on the traditional sequence-based POI recommender backbone, effectively learning the strong correlation between POIs and their corresponding timestamps through these two modules. We evaluated the proposed model with three real-world LBSN datasets and demonstrated that TAPT achieves comparable or superior performance in POI recommendation compared to the baseline backbone. Besides, TAPT can not only recommend the next POI, but predict the corresponding timestamp in the future. Yuanbo Xu, Hongxu Shen, Yiheng Jiang, En Wang |
IJCAI | 2 |