Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hongxu Shen

dblp:415/3944 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
point-of-interest recommendation
0.912025
Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation · IJCAI 2025
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation
0.912025
Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation · IJCAI 2025
Recommender systems › context-aware recommendation
spatio-temporal recommendation
0.312025
Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

timestamp encoding · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Where and When: Predict Next POI and Its Explicit Timestamp in Sequential Recommendation
abstract
Sequential point-of-interest (POI) recommendation aims to recommend the next POI for users in accordance with their historical check-in information. However, few attempts treat timestamps of check-ins as a core factor for sequence models, leading to insufficient insight into user behavior and subsequently suboptimal recommendations. To address these limitations, we propose to assign equal importance to both POIs and their timestamps, shifting the point of view to recommend the next POI and predict the corresponding timestamp. Along these lines, we present the Time-Aware POI Recommender with Timestamp Prediction (TAPT), a multi-task learning framework for explainable POI recommendations. Specifically, we begin by decoupling timestamps into multi-dimensional vectors and propose a timestamp encoding module to explicitly encode these vectors. Additionally, we design a specialized timestamp prediction module built on the traditional sequence-based POI recommender backbone, effectively learning the strong correlation between POIs and their corresponding timestamps through these two modules. We evaluated the proposed model with three real-world LBSN datasets and demonstrated that TAPT achieves comparable or superior performance in POI recommendation compared to the baseline backbone. Besides, TAPT can not only recommend the next POI, but predict the corresponding timestamp in the future.
Yuanbo Xu, Hongxu Shen, Yiheng Jiang, En Wang
IJCAI2