Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Austin T. Li

dblp:416/7396 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-3595-2866ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 87% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › KV cache management
cache eviction
0.912025
Learned Prefix Caching for Efficient LLM Inference · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
LLM inference optimization
0.912025
Learned Prefix Caching for Efficient LLM Inference · NeurIPS 2025
Distributed systems
edge computing
0.912025
Running Consistent Applications Closer to Users with Radical for Lower Latency · SOSP 2025
Distributed systems › consistency models
linearizability
0.912025
Running Consistent Applications Closer to Users with Radical for Lower Latency · SOSP 2025
Distributed systems
replication
0.912025
Running Consistent Applications Closer to Users with Radical for Lower Latency · SOSP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference
0.312025
Learned Prefix Caching for Efficient LLM Inference · NeurIPS 2025
Distributed systems
consensus
0.312025
Running Consistent Applications Closer to Users with Radical for Lower Latency · SOSP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

write intents · 0.9speculative execution · 0.9locking · 0.9learned eviction policy · 0.9conversational content analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learned Prefix Caching for Efficient LLM Inference
abstract
Prefix caching is a key technique for reducing Large Language Model (LLM) inference costs. However, the prevalent least-recently-used (LRU) eviction algorithm has a large gap to the optimal algorithm. This paper introduces LPC, the first learned method to perform LLM prefix cache eviction. LPC leverages conversational content analysis to provide predictive guidance for eviction, determining which conversations are likely to continue. These insights, combined with last access timestamps, inform more effective cache management. Extensive evaluations across three real-world datasets demonstrate that LPC achieves 18-47% reductions in required cache sizes for equivalent hit ratios and has an 11% improvement in LLM prefilling throughput in an emulated environment.
Dongsheng Yang 0001, Austin T. Li, Kai Li 0001, Wyatt Lloyd
NeurIPS2
2025 Running Consistent Applications Closer to Users with Radical for Lower Latency
abstract
Running applications close to users—in nearby datacenters, at edge points of presence, or in on-premises clusters—is attractive, as it reduces end-to-end latency. Moving strong consistent applications closer to users is difficult, as they incur high latencies either when accessing, or coordinating, their storage system. This restricts such applications to running co-located with their data, in a datacenter. Radical allows these applications to leverage the latency benefits that come from running near users. Radical uses its new LVI protocol to perform all necessary coordination in a single request. This request guarantees linearizability with a combination of locks, a validation step, and write intents. Radical hides the latency of the LVI request by overlapping it with speculative execution of the application. Our evaluation shows that Radical achieves 84–89% of the latency improvement obtainable by moving out of the datacenter, while providing Linearizability.
Nicolaas Kaashoek, Oleg Aleksandrovich Golev, Austin T. Li, Amit Levy 0001, Wyatt Lloyd
SOSP3