Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Trappen
dblp:417/8542
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-4502-1777ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 50% Usability and user experience research · 38% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction
LLM chatbot |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPT · CHI 2026 |
Usability and user experience research
user perception |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPT · CHI 2026 |
Human-AI interaction › user perception of AI
hallucination perception |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPT · CHI 2026 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › privacy
privacy perception |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPT · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
field study · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPTabstractAs the use of Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots by students and researchers becomes more prevalent, universities are pressed to develop AI strategies. One strategy that many universities pursue is to customize pre-trained LLM-as-a-service (LLMaaS) chatbots. While most studies on LLMaaS chatbots prioritize technical adaptations, these systems are often mainly characterized by user-salient front-end customizations, e. g., interface changes. Yet, no existing studies have examined how users perceive such systems compared to commercial LLM chatbots. In a field study, we investigate how students and employees (N = 526) at a German university perceive and use their institution’s customized LLMaaS chatbot compared to ChatGPT. Participants using both systems (n = 116) reported greater trust, higher perceived privacy, and less perceived hallucinations with their university’s customized LLMaaS chatbot compared to ChatGPT. We discuss implications for research on users’ trustworthiness assessment process, and offer guidance for the design and deployment of LLMaaS chatbots. Leon Hannig, Annika Bush, Meltem Aksoy, Tim Trappen, Steffen Becker 0003, Greta Ontrup |
CHI | 4 |