Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nigreisy Montalvo

dblp:419/9008 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
clinical genomics
0.912025
Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings · Bioinform. 2025
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.312025
Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings · Bioinform. 2025
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
rare disease diagnosis
0.312025
Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised machine learning · 0.9federated learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings
abstract
MOTIVATION: Rare diseases collectively affect 5% of the population. However, fewer than 50% of rare disease patients receive a molecular diagnosis after whole genome sequencing. Supervised machine learning is a valuable approach for the pathogenicity scoring of human genetic variants. However, existing methods are often trained on curated but limited central repositories, resulting in poor accuracy when tested on external cohorts. Yet, large collections of variants generated at hospitals and research institutions remain inaccessible to machine-learning purposes because of privacy and legal constraints. Federated learning (FL) algorithms have been recently developed enabling institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing their local datasets. RESULTS: Here, we present a proof-of-concept study evaluating the effectiveness of FL for the clinical classification of genetic variants. A comprehensive array of diverse FL strategies was assessed for coding and non-coding Single Nucleotide Variants as well as Copy Number Variants. Our results showed that federated models generally achieved comparable or superior performance to traditional centralized learning. In addition, federated models reached a robust generalization to independent sets with smaller data fractions as compared to their centralized model counterparts. Our findings support the adoption of FL to establish secure multi-institutional collaborations in human variant interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code required to reproduce the results presented in this article, implemented in Python, is available under the GNU General Public License v3 at https://github.com/RausellLab/FedLearnVar.
Nigreisy Montalvo, Francisco Requena, Emidio Capriotti, Antonio Rausell
Bioinform.1