Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frederik Schaffalitzky
dblp:42/70
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 11 · 5 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
3D vision · 84% Video understanding and tracking · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 33% Computational photography and imaging · 29% Image and video processing · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 65% Computational geometry · 35% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.2 | 4 | 2009 | Reconstruction from Projections Using Grassmann Tensors · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009 Reconstruction from Projections Using Grassmann Tensors · ECCV (1) 2004 L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems · CVPR (1) 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | Four Points in Two or Three Calibrated Views: Theory and Practice · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2006 Reconstruction from Projections Using Grassmann Tensors · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009 |
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | How Hard is 3-View Triangulation Really? · ICCV 2005 |
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
camera pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A Minimal Solution for Relative Pose with Unknown Focal Length · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Image and video processing › feature detection
interest point detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2005 |
Computational photography and imaging › camera geometry › camera motion estimation
relative pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A Minimal Solution for Relative Pose with Unknown Focal Length · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Geometric modeling and processing › computational geometry › polygonal partitioning
triangulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | How Hard is 3-View Triangulation Really? · ICCV 2005 |
Computational photography and imaging › camera calibration
unknown focal length |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A Minimal Solution for Relative Pose with Unknown Focal Length · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
epipolar geometry |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | What Do Four Points in Two Calibrated Images Tell Us about the Epipoles? · ECCV (2) 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
geometric reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems · CVPR (1) 2004 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
robust estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems · CVPR (1) 2004 |
Image and video processing
image matching |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Multi-view Matching for Unordered Image Sets, or "How Do I Organize My Holiday Snaps?" · ECCV (1) 2002 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Viewpoint Invariant Texture Matching and Wide Baseline Stereo · ICCV 2001 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Viewpoint Invariant Texture Matching and Wide Baseline Stereo · ICCV 2001 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
wide-baseline stereo |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Viewpoint Invariant Texture Matching and Wide Baseline Stereo · ICCV 2001 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric optimization
minimal solver |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Six Point Solution for Structure and Motion · ECCV (1) 2000 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
structure and motion estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Six Point Solution for Structure and Motion · ECCV (1) 2000 |
Geometric modeling and processing
multi-view geometry |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reconstruction from Projections Using Grassmann Tensors · ECCV (1) 2004 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems · CVPR (1) 2004 |
Computational geometry › geometric modeling and processing › point cloud analysis
geometric reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems · CVPR (1) 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Six Point Solution for Structure and Motion · ECCV (1) 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
calibrated views · 0.1tensor algebra · 0.1projective geometry · 0.1l-infinity minimization · 0.1grassmann tensor · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1image clustering · 0.1feature matching · 0.1multiview geometry · 0.1multi-view geometry · 0.1repeatability evaluation · 0.1polynomial root finding · 0.1minimal solvers · 0.1matching score evaluation · 0.1eigenvalue computation · 0.1eigendecomposition · 0.1computational commutative algebra · 0.1affine invariant descriptor · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Reconstruction from Projections Using Grassmann Tensors
Richard I. Hartley, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2008 | A minimal solution for relative pose with unknown focal length
Henrik Stewénius, David Nistér, Fredrik Kahl, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
Image Vis. Comput. | 4 |
| 2006 | Four Points in Two or Three Calibrated Views: Theory and Practice
David Nistér, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2006 | Object Level Grouping for Video Shots
Josef Sivic, Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2005 | A Minimal Solution for Relative Pose with Unknown Focal LengthabstractAssume that we have two perspective images with known intrinsic parameters except for an unknown common focal length. It is a minimally constrained problem to find the relative orientation between the two images given six corresponding points. We present an efficient solution to the problem and show that there are 15 solutions in general (including complex solutions). To the best of our knowledge this was a previously unsolved problem. The solutions are found through eigen-decomposition of a 15/spl times/15 matrix. The matrix itself is generated in closed form. We demonstrate through practical experiments that the algorithm is correct and numerically stable. Henrik Stewénius, David Nistér, Fredrik Kahl, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
CVPR (2) | 4 |
| 2005 | How Hard is 3-View Triangulation Really?abstractWe present a solution for optimal triangulation in three views. The solution is guaranteed to find the optimal solution because it computes all the stationary points of the (maximum likelihood) objective function. Internally, the solution is found by computing roots of multivariate polynomial equations, directly solving the conditions for stationarity. The solver makes use of standard methods from computational commutative algebra to convert the root-finding problem into a 47 /spl times/ 47 nonsymmetric eigenproblem. Although there are in general 47 roots, counting both real and complex ones, the number of real roots is usually much smaller. We also show experimentally that the number of stationary points that are local minima and lie in front of each camera is small but does depend on the scene geometry. Henrik Stewénius, Frederik Schaffalitzky, David Nistér |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2005 | A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors
Krystian Mikolajczyk, Tinne Tuytelaars, Cordelia Schmid, Andrew Zisserman, Jiri Matas, Frederik Schaffalitzky, Timor Kadir, Luc Van Gool |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 6 |
| 2004 | L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems
Richard I. Hartley, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
CVPR (1) | 2 |
| 2004 | Reconstruction from Projections Using Grassmann Tensors
Richard I. Hartley, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
ECCV (1) | 2 |
| 2004 | What Do Four Points in Two Calibrated Images Tell Us about the Epipoles?
David Nistér, Frederik Schaffalitzky |
ECCV (2) | 2 |
| 2004 | Object Level Grouping for Video Shots
Josef Sivic, Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
ECCV (2) | 2 |
| 2003 | Automated location matching in movies
Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 1 |
| 2002 | Multi-view Matching for Unordered Image Sets, or "How Do I Organize My Holiday Snaps?"
Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2002 | Automated reconstruction from multiple photographsabstractThis paper reviews two research themes. The first is wide baseline matching - establishing correspondences and cameras for images acquired from very different viewpoints. The second is automated surface reconstruction of a 3D scene from close-range images. These two themes are linked in an example application of automated architectural reconstruction from images. We demonstrate reconstructions of several university buildings from multiple photographs. Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman, Tomás Werner, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon |
ICIP (3) | 1 |
| 2001 | Viewpoint Invariant Texture Matching and Wide Baseline StereoabstractWe describe and demonstrate a texture region descriptor which is invariant to affine geometric and photometric transformations, and insensitive to the shape of the texture region. It is applicable to texture patches which are locally planar and have stationary statistics. The novelty of the descriptor is that it is based on statistics aggregated over the region, resulting in richer and more stable descriptors than those computed at a point. Two texture matching applications of this descriptor are demonstrated: (1) it is used to automatically identify, regions of the same type of texture, but with varying surface pose, within a single image; (2) it is used to support wide baseline stereo, i.e. to enable the automatic computation of the epipolar geometry between two images acquired from quite separated viewpoints. Results are presented on several sets of real images. Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2000 | A Six Point Solution for Structure and Motion
Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman, Richard I. Hartley, Philip Torr 0001 |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2000 | Planar grouping for automatic detection of vanishing lines and points
Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
Image Vis. Comput. | 1 |
| 1998 | Geometric Grouping of Repeated Elements within ImagesabstractThe objective of this work is the automatic detection and grouping of imaged elements which repeat in a scene. We show that structures that repeat in the world (for example wall paper patterns) are related by particular parametrized transformations in perspective images. These image transformations provide powerful grouping constraints, and can be used at the heart of hypothesize and verify grouping algorithms. Parametrized transformations are given for some classes of repeating op-eration in the world as well as some groupers based on these. These groupers are demonstrated on a number of real images, where both the elements and the grouping are determined automatically. It is also shown that the repeating element can be learnt from the image, and hence provides an image descrip-tor. 1 Frederik Schaffalitzky, Andrew Zisserman |
BMVC | 1 |