Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charny Park

dblp:42/9440 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene co-expression analysis
0.212014
lncRNAtor: a comprehensive resource for functional investigation of long non-coding RNAs · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology
long non-coding RNA
0.212014
lncRNAtor: a comprehensive resource for functional investigation of long non-coding RNAs · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-RNA interaction
0.212014
lncRNAtor: a comprehensive resource for functional investigation of long non-coding RNAs · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

enrichment analysis · 0.2RNA-Seq data analysis · 0.2PAR-CLIP · 0.2CLIP-seq · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Comparison of INDEL Calling Tools with Simulation Data and Real Short-Read Data
abstract
Insertions and deletions (INDELs) comprise a significant proportion of human genetic variation, and recent papers have revealed that many human diseases may be attributable to INDELs. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, many statistical/computational tools have been developed for calling INDELs. However, there are differences among those tools, and comparisons among them have been limited. In order to better understand these inter-tool differences, five popular and publicly available INDEL calling tools-GATK HaplotypeCaller, Platypus, VarScan2, Scalpel, and GotCloud-were evaluated using simulation data, 1000 Genomes Project data, and family-based sequencing data. The accuracy of INDEL calling by each tool was mainly evaluated by concordance rates. Family-based sequencing data, which consisted of 49 individuals from eight Korean families, were used to calculate Mendelian error rates. Our comparison results show that GATK HaplotypeCaller usually performs the best and that joint calling with Platypus can lead to additional improvements in accuracy. The result of this study provides important information regarding future directions for the variant detection and the algorithms development.
Donghe Li, Wonji Kim, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Boyoung Park, Charny Park, Sun-Young Kong, Yongdeuk Hwang, Daehyun Baek, Eun Sook Lee, Sungho Won
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.6
2014 lncRNAtor: a comprehensive resource for functional investigation of long non-coding RNAs
abstract
MOTIVATION: A number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified by deep sequencing methods, but their molecular and cellular functions are known only for a limited number of lncRNAs. Current databases on lncRNAs are mostly for cataloging purpose without providing in-depth information required to infer functions. A comprehensive resource on lncRNA function is an immediate need. RESULTS: We present a database for functional investigation of lncRNAs that encompasses annotation, sequence analysis, gene expression, protein binding and phylogenetic conservation. We have compiled lncRNAs for six species (human, mouse, zebrafish, fruit fly, worm and yeast) from ENSEMBL, HGNC, MGI and lncRNAdb. Each lncRNA was analyzed for coding potential and phylogenetic conservation in different lineages. Gene expression data of 208 RNA-Seq studies (4995 samples), collected from GEO, ENCODE, modENCODE and TCGA databases, were used to provide expression profiles in various tissues, diseases and developmental stages. Importantly, we analyzed RNA-Seq data to identify coexpressed mRNAs that would provide ample insights on lncRNA functions. The resulting gene list can be subject to enrichment analysis such as Gene Ontology or KEGG pathways. Furthermore, we compiled protein-lncRNA interactions by collecting and analyzing publicly available CLIP-seq or PAR-CLIP sequencing data. Finally, we explored evolutionarily conserved lncRNAs with correlated expression between human and six other organisms to identify functional lncRNAs. The whole contents are provided in a user-friendly web interface. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: lncRNAtor is available at http://lncrnator.ewha.ac.kr/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Charny Park, Namhee Yu, Ikjung Choi, Wan Kyu Kim, Sanghyuk Lee
Bioinform.1