Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sapir Harary

dblp:420/6651 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 74% Trustworthy machine learning · 26%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › hallucination detection
factual inconsistency detection
1.012026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
hallucination
1.012026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference
1.012026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization
0.312026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
controlled decoding
0.312026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability › factuality
factual consistency
0.312026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled decoding · 1.0beam reranking · 1.0NLI · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise
abstract
Natural Language Inference (NLI) models have been used in various ways to improve the factuality of LLM outputs.This is typically done by applying an NLI model to judge whether the model output is entailed from the supposed evidence, triggering some corrective actions, such as beam reranking at inference time or RL rewards during training.While NLI models are trained to detect factual inconsistencies over complete sentences, decisions in the common autoregressive generation architecture are made for each evolving text prefix, during decoding.Addressing this setting, we generalize the entailment detection task to apply over arbitrary text prefixes, and suggest its utility for improving generation faithfulness.Providing suitable evaluation and training datasets for this task, we train MiniTruePrefixes, a novel specialized model that better detects factual inconsistencies over text prefixes, outperforming comparable baseline NLI models by 5-14 F1 points in prefix-level entailment.We further demonstrate that integrating MiniTruePrefixes into a controlled decoding framework substantially improves factual consistency in abstractive summarization.When guided by Mini-TruePrefixes, LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instructmatches the faithfulness and runtime of the 8B model from the same model family, while using only half the memory.
Sapir Harary, Eran Hirsch, Aviv Slobodkin, David Wan, Mohit Bansal, Ido Dagan
ACL (1)1