Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timofey Kuznetsov

dblp:421/0524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Learning theory · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.912025
Regress, Don't Guess: A Regression-like Loss on Number Tokens for Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function
0.912025
Regress, Don't Guess: A Regression-like Loss on Number Tokens for Language Models · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distance · 0.9lp norm · 0.9cross-entropy loss · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Regress, Don't Guess: A Regression-like Loss on Number Tokens for Language Models
abstract
While language models have exceptional capabilities at text generation, they lack a natural inductive bias for emitting numbers and thus struggle in tasks involving quantitative reasoning, especially arithmetic. One fundamental limitation is the nature of the cross-entropy (CE) loss, which assumes a nominal scale and thus cannot convey proximity between generated number tokens. In response, we here present a regression-like loss that operates purely on token level. Our proposed Number Token Loss (NTL) comes in two flavors and minimizes either the $\mathcal{L}_p$ norm or the Wasserstein distance between the numerical values of the real and predicted number tokens. NTL can easily be added to any language model and extend the CE objective during training without runtime overhead. We evaluate the proposed scheme on various mathematical datasets and find that it consistently improves performance in math-related tasks. In a direct comparison on a regression task, we find that NTL can match the performance of a regression head, despite operating on token level. Finally, we scale NTL up to 3B parameter models and observe improved performance, demonstrating its potential for seamless integration into LLMs. We hope to inspire LLM developers to improve their pretraining objectives and distribute NTL as a minimalistic and lightweight PyPI package *ntloss*: https://ibm.biz/ntl-pypi-repo. Development code for full paper reproduction is available separately.
Jonas Zausinger, Lars Pennig, Anamarija Kozina, Sean Sdahl, Julian Sikora, Adrian Dendorfer, Timofey Kuznetsov, Mohamad Hagog, Nina Wiedemann, Kacper Chlodny, Vincent Limbach, Anna Ketteler, Thorben Prein, Vishwa Mohan Singh, Michael M. Danziger, Jannis Born
ICML7