Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seonah Han
dblp:422/6630
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 38% Speech recognition and synthesis · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Do Language Models Associate Sound with Meaning? A Multimodal Study of Sound Symbolism · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
sound symbolism |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Do Language Models Associate Sound with Meaning? A Multimodal Study of Sound Symbolism · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Do Language Models Associate Sound with Meaning? A Multimodal Study of Sound Symbolism · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Do Language Models Associate Sound with Meaning? A Multimodal Study of Sound Symbolism · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
phoneme-level attention fraction · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Do Language Models Associate Sound with Meaning? A Multimodal Study of Sound SymbolismabstractSound symbolism is a linguistic concept that refers to non-arbitrary associations between phonetic forms and their meanings. We suggest that this can be a compelling probe into how Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) interpret auditory information in human languages. We investigate MLLMs' performance on phonetic iconicity across textual (orthographic and IPA) and auditory forms of inputs with up to 25 semantic dimensions (e.g., sharp vs. round), observing models' layer-wise information processing by measuring phoneme-level attention fraction scores. To this end, we present LEX-ICON, an extensive mimetic word dataset consisting of 8,052 words from four natural languages (English, French, Japanese, and Korean) and 2,930 systematically constructed pseudo-words, annotated with semantic features applied across both text and audio modalities. Our key findings demonstrate (1) MLLMs' phonetic intuitions that align with existing linguistic research across multiple semantic dimensions and (2) phonosemantic attention patterns that highlight models' focus on iconic phonemes. These results bridge domains of artificial intelligence and cognitive linguistics, providing the first large-scale, quantitative analyses of phonetic iconicity in terms of MLLMs' interpretability. Jinhong Jeong, Sunghyun Lee 0001, Seonah Han, Youngjae Yu |
AAAI | 4 |