Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rakhmanov Mikhail

dblp:425/5060 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-1995-0142ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 87% Image and video coding · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
subjective quality assessment
0.912025
Screen Content Video Dataset and Benchmark · ACM Multimedia 2025
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
video quality assessment
0.912025
Screen Content Video Dataset and Benchmark · ACM Multimedia 2025
Image and video coding › quality assessment › compression artifacts
video compression artifacts
0.312025
Screen Content Video Dataset and Benchmark · ACM Multimedia 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowdsourced pairwise comparison · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Screen Content Video Dataset and Benchmark
abstract
Screen sharing is a common feature in video conferencing applications, especially for remote work and presentations. However, internet conditions such as limited bandwidth, packet loss, and compression can significantly reduce the visual quality of shared screen content. Most existing video quality metrics are designed for natural scenes and were not benchmarked on screen content. In this work, we present a large-scale subjective dataset of screen content videos captured from video conferencing apps. The dataset includes 1,600 distorted videos with corresponding subjective quality scores. Subjective scores were collected using crowdsourced pairwise comparisons. The dataset provides a valuable resource for developing and benchmarking video quality metrics tailored to screen content. The evaluation of objective metrics revealed that several general-purpose quality metrics outperform both full-reference and no-reference metrics. The dataset is available at the following link: https://videoprocessing.github.io/screen-content-dataset.
Nickolay Safonov, Rakhmanov Mikhail, Dmitriy S. Vatolin
ACM Multimedia2