Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael JQ Zhang

dblp:425/8070 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Reinforcement learning · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
learning from user feedback
0.912025
User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal · EMNLP 2025
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
user study
0.312025
User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7conversation log analysis · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal
abstract
Once language models (LMs) are deployed, they can interact with users long-term, ideally evolving based on their feedback.Asking for direct user feedback can be disruptive; thus, we study harvesting implicit user feedback from user-LM interaction logs.We study two user-LM interaction datasets (WildChat and LMSYS).First, we analyze user feedback in the user-LLM conversation logs, providing insights into when and why such feedback occurs.Second, we study harvesting learning signals from such implicit user feedback.Specifically, we study whether incorporating the contents of user feedback (e.g., user wanted clarification), in addition to the polarity of the feedback, can improve the model performance.We observe mixed results, showing this helps in short human-designed questions (MTBench) but not on longer and more complex questions (Wild-Bench).Together, we provide an in-depth study of implicit user feedback, showing its potential and limitations.
Michael JQ Zhang, Eunsol Choi
EMNLP2