Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael JQ Zhang
dblp:425/8070
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Reinforcement learning · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
learning from user feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal · EMNLP 2025 |
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
user study |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7conversation log analysis · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning SignalabstractOnce language models (LMs) are deployed, they can interact with users long-term, ideally evolving based on their feedback.Asking for direct user feedback can be disruptive; thus, we study harvesting implicit user feedback from user-LM interaction logs.We study two user-LM interaction datasets (WildChat and LMSYS).First, we analyze user feedback in the user-LLM conversation logs, providing insights into when and why such feedback occurs.Second, we study harvesting learning signals from such implicit user feedback.Specifically, we study whether incorporating the contents of user feedback (e.g., user wanted clarification), in addition to the polarity of the feedback, can improve the model performance.We observe mixed results, showing this helps in short human-designed questions (MTBench) but not on longer and more complex questions (Wild-Bench).Together, we provide an in-depth study of implicit user feedback, showing its potential and limitations. Michael JQ Zhang, Eunsol Choi |
EMNLP | 2 |