Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ladislav Hovan
dblp:426/1918
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8847-9295ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 64% Computing education · 36% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPONGE: simple prior omics network GEnerator · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPONGE: simple prior omics network GEnerator · Bioinform. 2025 |
Computing education › software engineering education
team-based software development |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving bioinformatics software quality through teamwork · Bioinform. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
database integration · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SPONGE: simple prior omics network GEneratorabstractSUMMARY: Gene regulatory networks modelled from experimental data can be improved through the use of prior biological knowledge, e.g. transcription factor binding. There are several tools that utilize this information. However, the prior networks used with them are often not updated and may fail to reflect the most up-to-date information. Here we present SPONGE, a Python module designed to access information across biological databases, chiefly JASPAR and STRING, to model two types of networks-a prior gene regulatory network mapping transcription factors to genes based on their predicted binding sites, and a prior protein-protein interaction network mapping potential interactions between transcription factors. SPONGE is mainly designed to work with the PANDA algorithm and the corresponding NetZoo family of tools. However, the networks are provided in an easily adaptable format for other tools. SPONGE was designed with ease of use in mind, and it provides sensible default values for all of its parameters while giving the users the freedom to fine-tune them. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the Python module and the documentation can be found in our GitHub repository. Ladislav Hovan, Marieke L. Kuijjer |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2024 | Improving bioinformatics software quality through teamworkabstractSUMMARY: Since high-throughput techniques became a staple in biological science laboratories, computational algorithms, and scientific software have boomed. However, the development of bioinformatics software usually lacks software development quality standards. The resulting software code is hard to test, reuse, and maintain. We believe that the root of inefficiency in implementing the best software development practices in academic settings is the individualistic approach, which has traditionally been the norm for recognizing scientific achievements and, by extension, for developing specialized software. Software development is a collective effort in most software-heavy endeavors. Indeed, the literature suggests teamwork directly impacts code quality through knowledge sharing, collective software development, and established coding standards. In our computational biology research groups, we sustainably involve all group members in learning, sharing, and discussing software development while maintaining the personal ownership of research projects and related software products. We found that group members involved in this endeavor improved their coding skills, became more efficient bioinformaticians, and obtained detailed knowledge about their peers' work, triggering new collaborative projects. We strongly advocate for improving software development culture within bioinformatics through collective effort in computational biology groups or institutes with three or more bioinformaticians. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Additional information and guidance on how to get started is available at https://ferenckata.github.io/ImprovingSoftwareTogether.github.io/. Katalin Ferenc, Ieva Rauluseviciute, Ladislav Hovan, Marieke L. Kuijjer, Anthony Mathelier |
Bioinform. | 3 |