Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phi Van Dat

dblp:426/9077 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 75% Language models and text generation · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.012026
CTPD: Cross Tokenizer Preference Distillation · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation › LLM distillation
cross-tokenizer distillation
1.012026
CTPD: Cross Tokenizer Preference Distillation · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
1.012026
CTPD: Cross Tokenizer Preference Distillation · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distillation
preference distillation
1.012026
CTPD: Cross Tokenizer Preference Distillation · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

importance sampling · 1.0direct preference optimization · 1.0aligned span projection · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CTPD: Cross Tokenizer Preference Distillation
abstract
While knowledge distillation has seen widespread use in pre-training and instruction tuning, its application to aligning language models with human preferences remains underexplored, particularly in the more realistic cross-tokenizer setting. The incompatibility of tokenization schemes between teacher and student models has largely prevented fine-grained, white-box distillation of preference information. To address this gap, we propose Cross-Tokenizer Preference Distillation (CTPD), the first unified framework for transferring human-aligned behavior between models with heterogeneous tokenizers. CTPD introduces three key innovations: (1) Aligned Span Projection, which maps teacher and student tokens to shared character-level spans for precise supervision transfer; (2) a cross-tokenizer adaptation of Token-level Importance Sampling (TIS-DPO) for improved credit assignment; and (3) a Teacher-Anchored Reference, allowing the student to directly leverage the teacher’s preferences in a DPO-style objective. Our theoretical analysis grounds CTPD in importance sampling, and experiments across multiple benchmarks confirm its effectiveness, with significant performance gains over existing methods. These results establish CTPD as a practical and general solution for preference distillation across diverse tokenization schemes, opening the door to more accessible and efficient alignment of language models.
Phi Van Dat, Ngan Nguyen, Ngo Van Linh 0001, Trung Le 0001, Thanh Hong Nguyen
AAAI2