Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cansu Elmadagli

dblp:429/1450 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5526-9774ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › cognitive human-robot interaction
theory of mind
1.012026
Theory of Whose Mind? Exposing the Shortcomings of One of HRI's Core Concepts · HRI 2026
Human-robot interaction
social intelligence
0.312026
Theory of Whose Mind? Exposing the Shortcomings of One of HRI's Core Concepts · HRI 2026
Human-robot interaction
social robot
0.312026
Theory of Whose Mind? Exposing the Shortcomings of One of HRI's Core Concepts · HRI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

critical analysis · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Theory of Whose Mind? Exposing the Shortcomings of One of HRI's Core Concepts
abstract
The concept of Theory of Mind (ToM) is central to many social robotic studies. It may be invoked during the design of social robots as a way to improve collaboration or create a form of "social intelligence". It is also considered as an established fact and never put in question. However, many scholars have analysed the concept of ToM from a critical perspective and argued that it is, in fact, a theory with significant shortcomings, that rests on neuronormative and neuroprivileged grounds.
Cansu Elmadagli, Jennifer Renoux
HRI1