Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhiram Srivatsa Kadaba

dblp:429/6951 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 67% 3D vision · 33%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.012026
Physics Consistent World Models via Schrödinger-Bridge Optimal Transport for Computational Imaging and 3D-Consistent Video Generations · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling › video generation
physics-informed video generation
1.012026
Physics Consistent World Models via Schrödinger-Bridge Optimal Transport for Computational Imaging and 3D-Consistent Video Generations · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision transformer · 2.0u-net · 2.0schrödinger bridge · 2.0optimal transport · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Physics Consistent World Models via Schrödinger-Bridge Optimal Transport for Computational Imaging and 3D-Consistent Video Generations
abstract
Modern generative models often violate basic physical principles. Shadows drift, geometry becomes inconsistent across views, and measurement models are ignored, which limits trust in both video synthesis and computational imaging. We propose a finite time Schrödinger Bridge (SB) world model that formulates generation as entropy regularized optimal transport from a simple prior to a distribution that is consistent with both data and physics. Instead of applying consistency corrections only at the final output, the framework introduces geometric and physical structure directly along the generative path. For video, the model enforces multiview geometric constraints through reprojection and epipolar agreement, homographies, and depth guided warping. For imaging, it incorporates differentiable optical operators, including point spread function based defocus models and lightweight Fourier propagation for coherent and partially coherent settings. When camera poses are known, the model penalizes reprojection error and warp aligned photometric or feature inconsistencies. When poses are unknown, a compact motion or flow estimator encourages cycle consistent trajectories. A lightweight UNet or Vision Transformer backbone, together with a short SB horizon, maintains computational efficiency. Evaluation will measure three dimensional and temporal consistency, physics fidelity through forward simulation residuals, and overall generative quality and efficiency using FID, KID, and FVD. Comparisons will include modern video diffusion models, plug and play data consistency methods, and unconstrained SB variants. The central hypothesis is that constraining the entire generative trajectory, rather than only the final frame, can shorten sampling while improving cross view coherence and physical plausibility across diverse sensing modalities, including cameras, microscopes, and medical imaging systems.
Abhiram Srivatsa Kadaba
AAAI1