Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erik Zawadzki

dblp:43/10549 · also Erik Peter Zawadzki · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 57% Computational complexity · 43%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice › voting
scoring rules
0.212015
Nonparametric Scoring Rules · AAAI 2015
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
SAT
0.212013
A Generalization of SAT and #SAT for Robust Policy Evaluation · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.012013
A Generalization of SAT and #SAT for Robust Policy Evaluation · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy evaluation
robust policy evaluation
0.012013
A Generalization of SAT and #SAT for Robust Policy Evaluation · IJCAI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

SAT solving · 0.3#SAT · 0.3maximum mean discrepancy · 0.2kernel methods · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Nonparametric Scoring Rules
abstract
A scoring rule is a device for eliciting and assessing probabilistic forecasts from an agent. When dealing with continuous outcome spaces, and absent any prior insights into the structure of the agent's beliefs, the rule should allow for a flexible reporting interface that can accurately represent complicated, multi-modal distributions. In this paper, we provide such a scoring rule based on a nonparametric approach of eliciting a set of samples from the agent and efficiently evaluating the score using kernel methods. We prove that sampled reports of increasing size converge rapidly to the true score, and that sampled reports are approximately optimal. We also demonstrate a connection between the scoring rule and the maximum mean discrepancy divergence. Experimental results are provided that confirm rapid convergence and that the expected score correlates well with standard notions of divergence, both important considerations for ensuring that agents are incentivized to report accurate information.
Erik Zawadzki, Sébastien Lahaie
AAAI1
2015 Formal verification of ACAS X, an industrial airborne collision avoidance system
abstract
Formal verification of industrial systems is very challenging, due to reasons ranging from scalability issues to communication difficulties with engineering-focused teams. More importantly, industrial systems are rarely designed for verification, but rather for operational needs. In this paper we present an overview of our experience using hybrid systems theorem proving to formally verify ACAS X, an airborne collision avoidance system for airliners scheduled to be operational around 2020. The methods and proof techniques presented here are an overview of the work already presented in [8], while the evaluation of ACAS X has been significantly expanded and updated to the most recent version of the system, run 13. The effort presented in this paper is an integral part of the ACAS X development and was performed in tight collaboration with the ACAS X development team.
Jean-Baptiste Jeannin, Khalil Ghorbal, Yanni Kouskoulas, Ryan W. Gardner, Aurora C. Schmidt, Erik Zawadzki, André Platzer
EMSOFT6
2015 A Formally Verified Hybrid System for the Next-Generation Airborne Collision Avoidance System
Jean-Baptiste Jeannin, Khalil Ghorbal, Yanni Kouskoulas, Ryan W. Gardner, Aurora C. Schmidt, Erik Zawadzki, André Platzer
TACAS6
2013 Memory-efficient groupby-aggregate using compressed buffer trees
abstract
The rapid growth of fast analytics systems, that require data processing in memory, makes memory capacity an increasingly-precious resource. This paper introduces a new compressed data structure called a Compressed Buffer Tree (CBT). Using a combination of techniques including buffering, compression, and serialization, CBTs improve the memory efficiency and performance of the GroupBy-Aggregate abstraction that forms the basis of not only batch-processing models like MapReduce, but recent fast analytics systems too. For streaming workloads, aggregation using the CBT uses 21--42% less memory than using Google SparseHash with up to 16% better throughput. The CBT is also compared to batch-mode aggregators in MapReduce runtimes such as Phoenix++ and Metis and consumes 4x and 5x less memory with 1.5--2x and 3--4x more performance respectively.
Hrishikesh Amur, Wolfgang Richter 0001, David G. Andersen, Michael Kaminsky, Karsten Schwan, Athula Balachandran, Erik Zawadzki
SoCC7
2013 A Generalization of SAT and #SAT for Robust Policy Evaluation
Erik Zawadzki, André Platzer, Geoffrey J. Gordon
IJCAI1