Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Strohmann

dblp:43/5085 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 84% Learning theory · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph construction
knowledge extraction
0.212014
Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion · KDD 2014
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.212014
Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion · KDD 2014
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.122003
Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003
A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › large margin methods
minimax probability machine
0.122003
Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003
A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
sparse kernel methods
0.012003
Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression
0.012002
A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression · NIPS 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised machine learning · 0.2probabilistic inference · 0.2greedy basis selection · 0.0mercer kernel · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion
abstract
Recent years have witnessed a proliferation of large-scale knowledge bases, including Wikipedia, Freebase, YAGO, Microsoft's Satori, and Google's Knowledge Graph. To increase the scale even further, we need to explore automatic methods for constructing knowledge bases. Previous approaches have primarily focused on text-based extraction, which can be very noisy. Here we introduce Knowledge Vault, a Web-scale probabilistic knowledge base that combines extractions from Web content (obtained via analysis of text, tabular data, page structure, and human annotations) with prior knowledge derived from existing knowledge repositories. We employ supervised machine learning methods for fusing these distinct information sources. The Knowledge Vault is substantially bigger than any previously published structured knowledge repository, and features a probabilistic inference system that computes calibrated probabilities of fact correctness. We report the results of multiple studies that explore the relative utility of the different information sources and extraction methods.
Xin Dong 0001, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Ni Lao, Kevin Murphy 0002, Thomas Strohmann, Shaohua Sun, Wei Zhang 0152
KDD7
2003 Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification
abstract
The Minimax Probability Machine Classification (MPMC) framework [Lanckriet et al., 2002] builds classifiers by minimizing the maximum probability of misclassification, and gives direct estimates of the proba- bilistic accuracy bound Ω. The only assumptions that MPMC makes is that good estimates of means and covariance matrices of the classes exist. However, as with Support Vector Machines, MPMC is computationally expensive and requires extensive cross validation experiments to choose kernels and kernel parameters that give good performance. In this paper we address the computational cost of MPMC by proposing an algorithm that constructs nonlinear sparse MPMC (SMPMC) models by incremen- tally adding basis functions (i.e. kernels) one at a time – greedily select- ing the next one that maximizes the accuracy bound Ω. SMPMC auto- matically chooses both kernel parameters and feature weights without us- ing computationally expensive cross validation. Therefore the SMPMC algorithm simultaneously addresses the problem of kernel selection and feature selection (i.e. feature weighting), based solely on maximizing the accuracy bound Ω. Experimental results indicate that we can obtain reli- able bounds Ω, as well as test set accuracies that are comparable to state of the art classification algorithms.
Thomas Strohmann, Andrei Belitski, Gregory Z. Grudic, Dennis DeCoste
NIPS1
2002 A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression
abstract
We formulate the regression problem as one of maximizing the mini- mum probability, symbolized by (cid:10), that future predicted outputs of the regression model will be within some (cid:6)" bound of the true regression function. Our formulation is unique in that we obtain a direct estimate of this lower probability bound (cid:10). The proposed framework, minimax probability machine regression (MPMR), is based on the recently de- scribed minimax probability machine classification algorithm [Lanckriet et al.] and uses Mercer Kernels to obtain nonlinear regression models. MPMR is tested on both toy and real world data, verifying the accuracy of the (cid:10) bound, and the efficacy of the regression models.
Thomas Strohmann, Gregory Z. Grudic
NIPS1