Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Strohmann
dblp:43/5085
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 84% Learning theory · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph construction
knowledge extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion · KDD 2014 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion · KDD 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 2 | 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003 A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › large margin methods
minimax probability machine |
0.1 | 2 | 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003 A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
sparse kernel methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine Regression · NIPS 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised machine learning · 0.2probabilistic inference · 0.2greedy basis selection · 0.0mercer kernel · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusionabstractRecent years have witnessed a proliferation of large-scale knowledge bases, including Wikipedia, Freebase, YAGO, Microsoft's Satori, and Google's Knowledge Graph. To increase the scale even further, we need to explore automatic methods for constructing knowledge bases. Previous approaches have primarily focused on text-based extraction, which can be very noisy. Here we introduce Knowledge Vault, a Web-scale probabilistic knowledge base that combines extractions from Web content (obtained via analysis of text, tabular data, page structure, and human annotations) with prior knowledge derived from existing knowledge repositories. We employ supervised machine learning methods for fusing these distinct information sources. The Knowledge Vault is substantially bigger than any previously published structured knowledge repository, and features a probabilistic inference system that computes calibrated probabilities of fact correctness. We report the results of multiple studies that explore the relative utility of the different information sources and extraction methods. Xin Dong 0001, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Ni Lao, Kevin Murphy 0002, Thomas Strohmann, Shaohua Sun, Wei Zhang 0152 |
KDD | 7 |
| 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine ClassificationabstractThe Minimax Probability Machine Classification (MPMC) framework [Lanckriet et al., 2002] builds classifiers by minimizing the maximum probability of misclassification, and gives direct estimates of the proba- bilistic accuracy bound Ω. The only assumptions that MPMC makes is that good estimates of means and covariance matrices of the classes exist. However, as with Support Vector Machines, MPMC is computationally expensive and requires extensive cross validation experiments to choose kernels and kernel parameters that give good performance. In this paper we address the computational cost of MPMC by proposing an algorithm that constructs nonlinear sparse MPMC (SMPMC) models by incremen- tally adding basis functions (i.e. kernels) one at a time – greedily select- ing the next one that maximizes the accuracy bound Ω. SMPMC auto- matically chooses both kernel parameters and feature weights without us- ing computationally expensive cross validation. Therefore the SMPMC algorithm simultaneously addresses the problem of kernel selection and feature selection (i.e. feature weighting), based solely on maximizing the accuracy bound Ω. Experimental results indicate that we can obtain reli- able bounds Ω, as well as test set accuracies that are comparable to state of the art classification algorithms. Thomas Strohmann, Andrei Belitski, Gregory Z. Grudic, Dennis DeCoste |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2002 | A Formulation for Minimax Probability Machine RegressionabstractWe formulate the regression problem as one of maximizing the mini- mum probability, symbolized by (cid:10), that future predicted outputs of the regression model will be within some (cid:6)" bound of the true regression function. Our formulation is unique in that we obtain a direct estimate of this lower probability bound (cid:10). The proposed framework, minimax probability machine regression (MPMR), is based on the recently de- scribed minimax probability machine classification algorithm [Lanckriet et al.] and uses Mercer Kernels to obtain nonlinear regression models. MPMR is tested on both toy and real world data, verifying the accuracy of the (cid:10) bound, and the efficacy of the regression models. Thomas Strohmann, Gregory Z. Grudic |
NIPS | 1 |