Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Saadia Malik

dblp:43/5313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval › structured document retrieval › XML retrieval
element retrieval		 0.112006
Is XML retrieval meaningful to users?: searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval › document retrieval › structured document retrieval
XML retrieval		 0.112006
Is XML retrieval meaningful to users?: searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval
interactive information retrieval		 0.012006
Is XML retrieval meaningful to users?: searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval › user behavior
search behavior		 0.012006
Is XML retrieval meaningful to users?: searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements · SIGIR 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Is XML retrieval meaningful to users?: searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements
abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate whether element retrieval (as opposed to full-text retrieval) is meaningful and useful for searchers when carrying out information-seeking tasks. Our results suggest that searchers find the structural breakdown of documents useful when browsing within retrieved documents, and provide support for the usefulness of element retrieval in interactive settings.
Birger Larsen, Anastasios Tombros, Saadia Malik
 SIGIR3