Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicola Barile
dblp:43/5616
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Image recognition and object detection · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA · ICDM 2008 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
monotonic classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA · ICDM 2008 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
ordinal classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA · ICDM 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
l1 loss minimization · 0.1interpolation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Active Learning with Monotonicity ConstraintsabstractIn many applications of data mining it is known beforehand that the response variable should be increasing (or decreasing) in the attributes. We propose two algorithms to exploit such monotonicity constraints for active learning in ordinal classification in two different settings. The basis of our approach is the observation that if the class label of an object is given, then the monotonicity constraints may allow the labels of other objects to be inferred. For instance, from knowing that loan applicant a is rejected, it can be concluded that all applicants that score worse than a on all criteria should be rejected as well. We propose two heuristics to select good query points. These heuristics make a selection based on a point's potential to determine the labels of other points. The algorithms, each implemented with the proposed heuristics, are evaluated on artificial and real data sets to study their performance. We conclude that exploitation of monotonicity constraints can be very beneficial in active learning. Nicola Barile, A. J. Feelders |
SDM | 1 |
| 2011 | Monotone Instance Ranking with mira
Nicola Barile, A. J. Feelders |
Discovery Science | 1 |
| 2009 | Isotonic Classification Trees
Rémon van de Kamp, A. J. Feelders, Nicola Barile |
IDA | 3 |
| 2008 | Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCAabstractWe describe a monotone classification algorithm called MOCA that attempts to minimize the mean absolute prediction error for classification problems with ordered class labels.We first find a monotone classifier with minimum L1loss on the training sample, and then use a simple interpolation scheme to predict the class labels for attribute vectors not present in the training data.We compare MOCA to the ordinal stochastic dominance learner (OSDL), on artificial as well as real data sets. We show that MOCA often outperforms OSDL with respect to mean absolute prediction error. Nicola Barile, A. J. Feelders |
ICDM | 1 |