Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicola Barile

dblp:43/5616 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Image recognition and object detection · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.112008
Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA · ICDM 2008
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
monotonic classification
0.112008
Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA · ICDM 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
ordinal classification
0.012008
Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA · ICDM 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

l1 loss minimization · 0.1interpolation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Active Learning with Monotonicity Constraints
abstract
In many applications of data mining it is known beforehand that the response variable should be increasing (or decreasing) in the attributes. We propose two algorithms to exploit such monotonicity constraints for active learning in ordinal classification in two different settings. The basis of our approach is the observation that if the class label of an object is given, then the monotonicity constraints may allow the labels of other objects to be inferred. For instance, from knowing that loan applicant a is rejected, it can be concluded that all applicants that score worse than a on all criteria should be rejected as well. We propose two heuristics to select good query points. These heuristics make a selection based on a point's potential to determine the labels of other points. The algorithms, each implemented with the proposed heuristics, are evaluated on artificial and real data sets to study their performance. We conclude that exploitation of monotonicity constraints can be very beneficial in active learning.
Nicola Barile, A. J. Feelders
SDM1
2011 Monotone Instance Ranking with mira
Nicola Barile, A. J. Feelders
Discovery Science1
2009 Isotonic Classification Trees
Rémon van de Kamp, A. J. Feelders, Nicola Barile
IDA3
2008 Nonparametric Monotone Classification with MOCA
abstract
We describe a monotone classification algorithm called MOCA that attempts to minimize the mean absolute prediction error for classification problems with ordered class labels.We first find a monotone classifier with minimum L1loss on the training sample, and then use a simple interpolation scheme to predict the class labels for attribute vectors not present in the training data.We compare MOCA to the ordinal stochastic dominance learner (OSDL), on artificial as well as real data sets. We show that MOCA often outperforms OSDL with respect to mean absolute prediction error.
Nicola Barile, A. J. Feelders
ICDM1