Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ker Wey Aw

dblp:431/9702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-7734-0521ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Health and well-being technologies · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
work-life balance
1.012026
"It's Messy...But I Feel Balanced": Unpacking Flexible Worker's Rhythm-Making Practices Using Asset-Based Approach · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative study · 1.0asset-based approach · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "It's Messy...But I Feel Balanced": Unpacking Flexible Worker's Rhythm-Making Practices Using Asset-Based Approach
abstract
Flexible work is increasingly pursued as a means of achieving work-life balance, particularly as growing caregiving responsibilities for children and aging family members shape workers’ lives. Yet most HCI research has examined flexibility primarily through productivity and organizational perspectives, with less attention to how it intersects with workers’ personal and family responsibilities. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study with 20 workers in Singapore engaging in flexible arrangements to manage paid work and care responsibilities. Using an asset-based lens, we show that flexibility is not a static benefit but a continual practice of rhythm-making. Participants maintained rhythms by drawing on temporal and spatial assets, negotiated them through relational and institutional dynamics, and sustained them through intrapersonal assets such as self-care and positive reframing. Our study reframes blurred boundaries as resources rather than disruptions and offers design implications for technologies that support flexible workers’ everyday rhythm-making practices.
Tse Pei Ng, Daniel Campos-Muñiz, Yiyang He, Ker Wey Aw, Jung-Joo Lee, Janghee Cho
CHI4