Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eloïse Yang

dblp:432/3401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 50% Human-robot interaction · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › emotion
emotional response
1.012026
Invisible Risks in Virtual Reality: Raising Awareness of Profiling and Overengagement through Lecture and Storyboard Interventions · VR 2026
Usability and user experience research
user awareness
1.012026
Invisible Risks in Virtual Reality: Raising Awareness of Profiling and Overengagement through Lecture and Storyboard Interventions · VR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

storyboard intervention · 3.0qualitative analysis · 3.0lecture intervention · 3.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Invisible Risks in Virtual Reality: Raising Awareness of Profiling and Overengagement through Lecture and Storyboard Interventions
abstract
This paper examines how awareness interventions relate to emotional responses to invisible risks in immersive systems, with an empirical focus on virtual reality. Across two complementary studies, we examine emotional responses elicited by a lecture and by narrative design-fiction storyboards focusing on biometric profiling and overengagement—two risks that undermine user agency and autonomy. The interventions elicit distinct emotional patterns, pointing to different ways in which invisible risks become salient across cognitive, affective, and moral dimensions. Qualitative responses indicate recognition of manipulation, loss of agency, and ethical concern. The results suggest that concise narrative scenarios can render otherwise imperceptible risks concrete and relatable.
Suzanne Kieffer, Damien Renard, Romilla Syed, Michel Noutcha, Eloïse Yang, Jean Vanderdonckt
VR5